New Indian-Chennai News + more

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: The God who never was becomes a rebel who never rebelled


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 24778
Date:
The God who never was becomes a rebel who never rebelled
Permalink  
 


 JC – Hero of the People

The God who never was becomes a rebel who never rebelled

A 'life' conjured up from mystical fantasy, a mass of borrowed quotations, copied story elements and a corpus of self-serving speculation, does not constitute an historical reality. It constitutes a myth, a hero-myth, in essentials no different from the legends of champions that times of crisis called into existence in many cultures. "Jesus Christ Lord and Saviour" is certainly the most convoluted and enduring of such accretions but its fabrication from simple elements is no less apparent than that of any other west Asian salvation god.

For Jewish radicals of the 1st century – whether militant patriots within Palestine or proto-Christians of the Jewish diaspora – the despised and neglected masses were both audience and market place. For a century or more the battle was joined for the future of Judaism.

In the Levant, militancy had the upper hand until the final debacle of 135. In the diaspora, a repackaged piety centred on a personal saviour god eventually gained the ascendancy, advancing with each successive reversal of belligerency and the attendant flood of refugees and captive slaves into the cities of the Mediterranean.

A revised 'rabbinic' Judaism made an impressive revival in the 2nd-3rd centuries. But by then a heresy called Christianity had been commandeered by gentile pagans who saw opportunity in a hybridised oriental cult with a strong Jewish core.

 

Rebel with a Sword? Enter the Nazarenes

"And it was in Gessius Florus's time that the nation began to grow mad with this distemper ... and to make them revolt from the Romans."

– Josephus, 18.1.6


As the 1st century unfolded a radical arm of the Essenes, the Zealots (‘zealous for the law’) and bands of assassins, known as Sicarii, actively resisted Roman occupation by aping the guerilla tactics of the Maccabees two hundred years earlier. They were part of a widening resistance movement.

Rome's removal of Archelaus and imposition of direct rule in 6AD precipitated a 'tax revolt'. Notable among the rebels was Judas the Galilean – son of the Ezekias murdered by Herod the Great a generation earlier. His followers appear to have been a particular band of fanatical Gaulonites. 4th century Bishop Epiphanius (Panarion 18-19) confirms that a sect was operating in the Bashan (the Golan Heights and east of the Sea of Galilee) and Galaaditis (the western Decapolis) called the Nasaraioi (variations on the name include"Nazorei" and "Nazarenoi"). Evidently they were orthodox Jews who had who broken away from temple sacrifice. The precise factional divide between Zealots and Nasaraioi is far from clear. Probably it depended upon the charisma of individual leaders at any given time.

The Nazarenes actually get a mention in the New Testament:

"For we have found this man a pestilent fellow, and a mover of sedition among all the Jews throughout the world, and a ringleader of the sect of the Nazarenes" – Acts 24.5


Judas himself appears to have been a member of a curious family dynasty of rebels who continued to lead a resistance movement at least until the defeat of 70 AD. Certainly, a century of ruthless exploitation by Rome, added to the fearsome exploitation by the priesthood and the Herodian aristocracy, created conditions which made civil war and rebellion inevitable.

 

Judaism's "Worthless peasants"

" A Jew must not marry a daughter of an Am ha-aretz because they are unclean animals and their women forbidden reptiles ... What God hath cleansed call thou not common!"

– Talmud (Mishnah, Tractate Demai 2


In Judaism's theocratic tyranny only the aristocracy had "holiness".

The Am ha-aretz (workers of the land, commoners), were too oppressed to say Shema night and day, wear phylacteries or fringe their garments. To the priestly aristocracy they were objects of contempt.

The poor, the disabled and the sick were all ritually unclean. Male Jews even had a morning prayer thanking God for "not being made a woman." Unwelcome in the sanctums of the Temple, those who would not, or could not, fight turned to a simple expedient: a river and a wild guru.

 

John the Baptist (30s AD)

Baptism in water probably originated in India on the banks of the Ganges, where the sacred waters drove out demons. Brahmans and Buddhist monks carried the idea to western Asia after the conquests of Alexander the Great.

It was adopted by groups such as the Essenes, with whom John the baptiser no doubt learned his craft. His new twist to an old idea was to replace self-baptism with an administered baptism. Doubtless, his bizarre ascetic practices gave him an aura of "other worldliness" and his sermonizing hope to those intimidated by the thought of armed resistance to Rome.

Josephus (Antiquities 18) gives a favourable report of the pacifist John, in stark contrast to his scathing comments on all the more robust rebels. John appears to have been active in Peraea – not far from Qumran itself.

 

Where did they get their ideas from?

The cult of John the Baptist grew up entirely independently of the Jesus cult and continued for centuries in competition with the aggressive newcomer. Christian scribes, plagiarizing from every source to hand, co-opted the Baptist for a supporting role in their own fantasy. They fabricated two links: firstly, a blood tie via a cousin of Mary; and secondly, by the tricky theology of having John baptize the sinless Jesus.

From Jewish Scripture:

Malachi 3:1 "Behold, I will send my messenger, and he shall prepare the way before me."

Isaiah 40:3 "The voice of him that crieth in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the LORD, make straight in the desert a highway for our God."

From Josephus:

"John ... was called the Baptist ... not for remission of sins, but for the purification of the body ... many others came in crowds about him ...

– Antiquities 18.5.2

"Banus lived in the desert, and used no other clothing than what grew upon trees, and had no other food than what grew of its own accord, and bathed himself in cold water frequently, both night and day, to purify himself."

– Life, 2

Herod slew him, who was a good man

Herod ... feared lest the great influence John had over the people ... thought it best, by putting him to death, to prevent any mischief he might cause ....

Accordingly he was sent a prisoner, out of Herod's suspicious temper, to Macherus ... and was there put to death."

– Antiquities 18.5.2

"Herod the tetrarch had married the daughter of Aretas ..." [called Phasaelis. She fled on learning of Herod's intended remarriage to his half-brother's wife. This prompted a war with Aretas]

"Emperor Tiberius, who was very angry at the attempt made by Aretas and wrote to Vitellius to make war upon him and either to take him alive, and bring him in chains, or to kill him, and send him his head."

– Antiquities 18.5.1

The weight of evidence suggests John the Baptist was executed in 36 AD.

Gospel:

Mark 1.2,3 "As it is written in the prophets: Behold, I send My messenger before thy face, who shall prepare thy way before thee.

The voice of one crying in the wilderness: 'Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make His paths straight.' "

Mark 1.4,5. "John did baptize in the wilderness, and preach the baptism of repentance for the remission of sins ...

And there went out unto him all the land..."


Mark 1.6. "Now John was clothed with camel's hair, with a leather belt around his waist, and he ate locusts and wild honey."

 

 


Mark 6:20. "For Herod feared John, knowing that he was a just and righteous man."

Luke 3.18,20. "Herod the tetrarch, being reproved by him ... shut up John in prison.

 

 

 

[Josephus does not name Herod's first wife and – surprise, surprise – nor do the gospels.]

 

 

 

Mark 6.27. "The king sent an executioner ... and he went and beheaded him in the prison."

 

Jewish Gnosis: Paul's "good news" for the Essenes –

paul-binladen.jpg

"I've seen your Messiah and He's Alive in Heaven!"

Paul appeals to the brethren of the Jewish diaspora?

 

The pacifist response to Roman occupation took more than one form.

The Romanisation of Palestine not only radicalised those Jews who resisted colonisation: it Hellenized the collaborators who embraced the new reality. An early Jewish Gnostic was the Samaritan "Simon the Magus" whose legacy was to inspire both the mystical "Kabala" (a refinement of Pythagorean "magic" numbers) and later Christian Gnostics – Basilides, Saturninus, Carpocrates among them.

Probably the most successful student of Simon was the apostle Paul, who would concoct a new, Jewish-oriented version of the ancient mystery cult tradition of dying and rising gods. In common with all the early Christian writers, Paul knew nothing of any human Jesus. His saviour originated (and remained!) in the ethereal world of pious imagination, both crucified by and triumphing over "Principalities and Powers":

"We speak the Wisdom of God in a mystery ... Which none of the Princes of this World knew: for had they known it, they would not have crucified the Lord of Glory." 
– 1 Corinthians 2:7,8

"And having spoiled Principalities and Powers, He made a shew of them openly, triumphing over them in it."
– Colossians 2.15


Paul justifies all this by recourse to Jewish scripture – not any appeal to an historic reality. Thus, "Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures" and "he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures" (Corinthians 15.3,4)

Paul's target audiences are the synagogues established in the diaspora – Corinth, Philippi, Ephesus, Colossi,  (the same "churches" berated in Revelation) – where he confronts rival salesmen (Apollos, followers of John, etc.) but has a "good news" message for the Essenes, whose memories of their founder are growing dim with time.

Paul has had a vision. He has seen the anointed one and he now sits at God's right hand! His death was a redemption (just like that of Adonis, Osiris, Dionysus, et al!) and his followers can look forward to salvation and an eternal life.

Paul finds The Exalted One a name…  "Jesus"

It would be reasonable to suppose that in identifying their dead hero with those of the past the Essenes had accorded him the same hallowed name: Joshua/Jesus. Unfortunately, use by the Essenes of cryptic pseudonyms denies us that confirmation.

However, quoted by Paul in his Epistle to the Philippians is a hymn, perhaps one which originated with the Essenes, whose synagogues in the Diaspora were the apostle's chosen recruiting ground. Paul is hoping to win converts with his Gnosticised Judaism.

Paul is endeavouring to strengthen the faith of the brethren and in the hymn a heavenly being has "emptied himself" by taking the form of a servant of the Lord. The humiliating self-sacrifice earns the god a name "above all others":

”Therefore God has highly exalted him,
And bestowed on him the name that is above every name,

That at the name of Jesus, every knee should bow,
In heaven and on earth, and under the earth,

And every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord
To the glory of God the Father."
 
– Philippians 2.9,11.

How did a dead Essene make it to heaven? This neat trick (by now the Zadokite founder of the Essenes had been dead for 150 years) was achieved by "raising him", like Elijah, to heaven. God, it seems, had "glorified his servant", had "exalted" him to his right hand, he had entered or been "assumed" into Heaven. And Paul could agree with the Essenes: in the imminent Last of Days the sinful world would be destroyed utterly and the "brotherhood of the righteous" would inherit the earth.

 

The War of Light and Darkness

"And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh.

Then let them which are in Judaea flee to the mountains; and let them which are in the midst of it depart out; and let not them that are in the countries enter thereinto ... But woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck, in those days! for there shall be great distress in the land, and wrath upon this people.

And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles."

–  Luke (21.20,24), doubtless drawing on Josephus's description of the siege and famine in Jerusalem.

 

Paul himself passed on to heaven – or maybe just died – shortly before the violent eruption of the Jewish civil war and war against Rome.

The Jewish aristocracy was fatally split on the confrontation with Rome. Those whose ambition exceeded their judgement tried unsuccessfully to put themselves at the head of the popular movement and limit radical attacks upon all men of property. Indeed, discord was everywhere: Pharisee against Sadducee, Samaritan against Judaean, Syrian against Jew.

As the Roman war machine slowly yet relentlessly pacified the areas of rebellion, Zealots, Sicarii, Essenes and insurgents of all shades fled to the diminishing enclave around Jerusalem with the consequence that the aristocrats lost control and the 'revolution' became radicalised.

The radical factions were themselves in conflict. When the Idumean Simon bar Giora entered Jerusalem he came as "King of the Jews" yet John of Gischala continued to control most of the city. Resisting both were fanatical Zealots, who turned the Temple itself into a citadel and anticipated divine deliverance at the final hour.

Factional strife ceased only when Titus's four legions besieged the city for five months in 70 AD but by then the situation had become hopeless. Eventually breaching the formidable walls of the city, the Romans overwhelmed the hungry defenders. The Temple itself was burned to the ground and the city gutted. A few hundred Sicarii/Essene extremists continued  resistance further south, in the fortress palace of Massada. But after a three year siege they, too, were defeated. Their mass suicide is renowned.

 

Location, Location

If we can believe Eusebius among others (Ecc. His. 3.5.3), the proto-Christians made a smart exit before the disaster and made straight for Pella, a thoroughly Greek city of the Decapolis.

Perhaps while the militants were going up in flames, the proto-Christians first pondered the possibility of a pacifist hero who would not bring the Romans down on top of them?

pella.gif

"Pella ...This is where the Nazoraean sect began."

– 4th century Bishop Epiphanius (Panarion 29)

Pella was the very essence of an Hellenized city. Its ruins are as extensive as Jerash, though not as fully excavated.

 

However – Yet another void

"The first settlers at ancient Pella arrived in the Neolithic period, around 7500 B.C., and the site’s occupation continued for thousands of years.

When it came to first-century A.D. settlement at Pella, Jordan, archaeology surprisingly produced practically no remains. It seems that no one was living there at the time.

Soon after, the Romans resettled ancient Pella in the second century and developed it into a thriving economic center."

– Biblical Archaeology Review, May/June 2013

 

A Dying Flame – The Rebellion of 114-117

Last Breath – The War of 130-135

 

 

 

Sources:
Israel Shahak, Jewish History, Jewish Religion,The Weight of Three Thousand Years (Pluto, 1997)
Michael Grant, Herod the Great (McGraw-Hill, 1971)
Neil Faulkner, Apocalypse-The Great Jewish Revolt Against Rome AD66-73 (Tempus, 2004)
Tacitus, The Annals of Imperial Rome (Guild, 1990)
Nigel Rogers, The History & Conquests of Ancient Rome (Access, 2004)



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard