New Indian-Chennai News + more

Members Login
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Was Muhammad a Pedophile?


Status: Offline
Posts: 24624
Was Muhammad a Pedophile?


Was Muhammad a Pedophile?

An Examination of Muhammad’s Relationship with a Nine-Year-Old Girl

By David Wood

For the Western mind, perhaps the most disturbing fact about Islam is that its founder had a sexual relationship with a nine-year-old girl. Because of this, it has become increasingly popular in some circles to refer to the Prophet of Islam as a "pedophile." This is, of course, extremely offensive to Muslims, who view Muhammad as the ideal servant of God and as the greatest example of what a man should strive to be. Nevertheless, Muhammad’s relationship with a young girl presents a problem for Muslims, especially for those who want to share their faith with others.

Since much of the following information will come as a shock to those who are unfamiliar with this issue, we must be careful not to jump to hasty conclusions about Muhammad. Pedophilia is one of the most serious charges that can be leveled against a person, so the term "pedophile" should not be used lightly. We must also remember that, if a man has a sexual relationship with a young girl in a culture where such a union is permissible, this doesn’t necessarily mean that the man is a "sexual predator," as the term "pedophile" implies. Christians especially should be wary of flippant name-calling. With that said, let us carefully examine Muhammad’s relationship with Aisha, recalling the Western principle that a man is innocent until proven guilty.

FIRST MUSLIM DEFENSE: Aisha was older than nine years old.

Faced with the arguments of Western critics, Muslim apologists sometimes piece together information from various accounts in an attempt to deny that Aisha was as young as critics often claim:

The popular misconception as to Aishah’s age may be removed here. . . . Isabah, speaking of the Holy Prophet’s daughter Fatimah, says that she was about five years older than Aishah. It is a well-established fact that Fatimah was born when the Ka’bah was being rebuilt, i.e., five years before the Call. Aishah was therefore born in the year of the Call or a little before it, and she could not have been less than ten years at the time of her marriage with the Holy Prophet in the tenth year of the Call. . . . And as the period between her marriage and its consummation was not less than five years, because the consummation took place in the second year of the Flight, it follows that she could not have been less than fifteen at that time. The popular account that she was six years at marriage and nine years at the time of consummation is decidedly not correct because it supposes the period between the marriage and its consummation to be only three years, and this is historically wrong.[1]

RESPONSE: The evidence for Muhammad’s marriage to the nine-year-old Aisha is too strong to be ignored.

The problem with the selective and carefully edited defense just given (other than the complete lack of references) is that it ignores the numerous accounts we now possess which record Aisha’s age when Muhammad consummated his marriage to her. Many of these accounts are from Aisha herself. Indeed, the evidence for Muhammad’s marriage to the young Aisha is as strong as the evidence for just about any other fact in Islam. We have copious traditions relating Muhammad’s marriage proposal when Aisha was six or seven years old, as well as his consummation of that marriage when she was nine:

Aisha (may Allah be pleased with her) narrated that the Prophet (may the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) married her when she was six years old, and he consummated her in marriage when she was nine years old. Then she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death).[2]

Khadijah died three years before the Prophet (the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) departed to Madina. He stayed there for two years or so and then he married Aisha when she was a girl of six years of age, and he consummated that marriage when she was nine years old.[3]

Urwa narrated: The Prophet (may the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) wrote the (marriage contract) with Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years.[4]

Aisha (Allah be pleased with her) reported: Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) married me when I was six years old, and I was admitted to his house when I was nine years old.[5]

Aisha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) married her when she was seven years old, and she was taken to his house as a bride when she was nine, and her dolls were with her; and when he (the Holy Prophet) died she was eighteen years old.[6]

This is just a sample of the early Muslim traditions reporting Muhammad’s marriage to the young Aisha, but it is sufficient to show that she certainly wasn’t fifteen years old at the time of the consummation, as some Muslims claim.

(For a fuller treatment of the early evidence regarding Muhammad’s marriage to the young Aisha, click here.)

In addition to traditions regarding Aisha’s age, the Hadith also provides details about how the relationship began and progressed:

Aisha (may Allah be pleased with her) narrated that the Prophet (the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) said to her: "You have been shown to me twice in my dream. I saw you pictured on a piece of silk and someone said (to me), ‘This is your wife.’ When I uncovered the picture, I saw that it was yours. I said: ‘If this is from Allah, it will be done.’"[7]

After having this dream about Aisha, Muhammad proceeded to ask her father Abu Bakr for her hand in marriage. Abu Bakr understandably objected at first, but Muhammad was able to persuade him to agree. Aisha was later taken to Muhammad’s house:

The Prophet (may the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) asked Abu Bakr for Aisha’s hand in marriage. Abu Bakr said: "But I am your brother." The Prophet (may the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) said: "You are my brother in Allah’s religion and His Book, but she (Aisha) is lawful for me to marry."[8]

Aisha (may Allah be pleased with her) narrated: The Prophet (the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) married me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to Madina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, Umm Ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house. I was breathless then, and when my breathing became all right, she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some Ansari women who said: "Best wishes and Allah’s Blessing and good luck." Then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah’s Apostle (the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age.[9]

Aisha (may Allah be pleased with her) narrated: When the Prophet (may the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) married me, my mother came to me and made me enter the house (of the Prophet) and nothing surprised me but the coming of Allah’s Apostle to me in the forenoon.[10]

Once Aisha was a part of Muhammad’s household, she became his favorite wife, even after he married several other women. Indeed, Muhammad’s other wives had to plead with him for treatment equal to that of Aisha:[11]

The wives of Allah’s Apostle (the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) were in two groups. One group consisted of Aisha, Hafsa, Safiyya and Sauda; and the other group consisted of Umm Salama and the other wives of Allah’s Apostle (the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him). The Muslims knew that Allah’s Apostle (the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) loved Aisha, so if any of them had a gift and wished to give it to Allah’s Apostle (the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him), he would delay it, till Allah’s Apostle (the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) had come to Aisha’s home . . . The group of Umm Salama discussed the matter together and decided that Umm Salama should request Allah’s Apostle (the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) to tell the people to send their gifts to him in whatever wife’s house he was. . . . [Muhammad replied]: "Do not hurt me regarding Aisha, as the Divine Inspiration did not reveal it to me on any of the beds except that of Aisha." . . . Then the group of Umm Salama called Fatimah, the daughter of Allah’s Apostle (the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) and sent her to Allah’s Apostle (the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) to say to him: "Your wives request to treat them and the daughter of Abu Bakr on equal terms."[12]

Thus, Aisha held a place of special favor among Muhammad’s wives, which caused a great deal of tension among the women. Since it may be taken as historically certain that Aisha was very young when her marriage to Muhammad was consummated, critics sometimes charge that Muhammad’s preference for Aisha reveals his preference for young girls. The Hadith offers a certain amount of support for this view:

When I took the permission of Allah’s Apostle (the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him), he asked me whether I had married a matron. He said: "Why hadn’t you married a virgin that would play with you, and you would play with her?" I replied: "O Allah’s Apostle! My father died and I have young sisters, so I felt it not proper that I should marry a young girl like them who would neither teach them manners nor serve them."[13]

Aisha (may Allah be pleased with her) narrated: I used to play with the dolls in the presence of the Prophet (may the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him), and my girl friends also used to play with me. When Allah’s Apostle (may the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) used to enter (my dwelling place) they used to hide themselves, but the Prophet (may the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) would call them to join and play with me.[14]

Nevertheless, it must be noted that, if Muhammad had truly been obsessed with young girls, he could have taken many others as his wives. Muhammad eventually held complete power in Medina and later in Mecca, yet he didn’t build himself a harem of young girls. Since there isn’t enough evidence to support the charge that Muhammad had a perverted obsession with prepubescent girls, critics should be careful when making such a claim.

To sum up, the evidence makes it abundantly clear (1) that Muhammad had sexual intercourse with Aisha when she was very young, (2) that this relationship was pursued by Muhammad after he dreamed about her, and (3) that she was his favorite wife. With so much historical data reporting the age of Aisha, it should be obvious that Muslims who deny Muhammad’s relationship with her only do so out of embarrassment.

SECOND MUSLIM DEFENSE: Morality is relative to one’s culture.

Another method of defending Muhammad’s marriage to Aisha is the Muslim appeal to moral relativism. According to this view, since different cultures have different standards of morality, it is wrong to criticize the standards of others based on one’s own ethical system. Consider the following responses by Maqsood Jafri and Abdur Rahman Squires:

The Arabs practiced polygamy. In the wake of custom the Prophet Muhammad married some ladies. Hazrat Khadijah was fifteen years older [than] him at the time of marriage. Most of them were his age sake. In his fifties he married Hazrat Aiysha, the daughter of Hazrat Abu Bakr when she was just bloomed to youth. Hinting this marriage some of the orientalists charge Prophet Muhammad as a "pedophile". It was not only the Prophet Muhammad who had married a young girl [but] even the father of Hazrat Aiysha, Hazrat Abu Bakr had also married a young girl in his sixties. It was . . . part of the prevalent Arab culture and custom. Hence not to be taken seriously.[15]

The large majority of Islamic jurists say that the earliest time which a marriage can be consummated is at the onset of sexual maturity (bulugh), meaning puberty. Since this was the norm of all Semitic cultures and it still is the norm of many cultures today—it is certainly not something that Islam invented.[16]

Thus, since the practice of marrying young girls was "part of the prevalent Arab culture and custom," it is "not to be taken seriously" as a criticism of Islam.

RESPONSE: Islam is utterly inconsistent with moral relativism.

This defense is truly amazing, for, when defending Muhammad’s moral perfection, Muslims often maintain that Muhammad condemned the Arab culture for the prevalent immorality:

After spending his life in such chaste, pure and civilized manner, there comes a revolution in [Muhammad’s] being. He wearies of the darkness and ignorance, corruption, immorality, idolatry, and disorder which surround him on all sides. . . . He wants to get hold of that power with which he might bring about the downfall of the corrupt and disorderly world and lay the foundations of a new and better one. . . . He wanted to change the whole structure of society which had been handed down to them from time immemorial.[17]

Muslims are quick to point out immorality around the world, especially in the West. It seems, then, that they are suggesting a very inconsistent message. When confronted with an immoral practice in another culture, Muslims cry out in one accord, "We condemn these practices, for they are against the eternal, perfect, and unalterable Law of God!" Yet, whenever the moral character of Muhammad is being scrutinized, Muslims suddenly say, "Don’t judge Muhammad! You should remember that he was from a different culture! Marrying young girls was common in Arabia, and it still is, thanks to Muhammad’s precedent. Different people have different moral standards, so no one should worry about Muhammad’s sexual relationship with a nine-year-old girl."

This convenient switch from moral absolutism to moral relativism is logically unacceptable. If it is wrong to judge the practices of another culture, then both Muhammad and the Qur’an were wrong for condemning immoral practices in Arabia. But if condemning immoral practices is acceptable, then Muslim apologists need a better response to criticisms of Muhammad’s relationship with Aisha.

THIRD MUSLIM DEFENSE: Muhammad’s marriage to Aisha was part of God’s plan.

Muslim apologists have developed another answer to Muhammad’s critics, namely, that Muhammad’s marriage to Aisha was part of God’s divine plan (i.e. God had an important reason for it):

It should be borne in mind that, like all acts of the Holy Prophet (may peace be upon him), even this marriage had a Divine purpose behind it. Hazrat Aisha was a precocious girl and was developing both in mind and body with rapidity peculiar to such rare personalities. She was admitted to the house of the Holy Prophet (may peace be upon him) just at the threshold of her puberty, the most impressionable and formative period of her life. It was the Holy Prophet (may peace be upon him) who nurtured her sensibilities and directed the growth of her faculties to the most fruitful channel and thus she was made to play an eminent role in the history of Islam. Moreover, she was the only virgin lady to enter the House of the Holy Prophet (may peace be upon him) and was thus very competent to share the feelings of other ladies of younger age who had numerous questions to ask from the Holy Prophet (may peace be upon him) with regard to sexual ethics and morality. These ladies felt shy of asking them through the elderly wives of the Holy Prophet (may peace be upon him) out of modesty. They could speak out their minds comparatively more freely to Aisha who was more or less of their own age group.[18]

Puberty is a biological sign which shows that a woman is capable of bearing children. Can anyone logically deny this? Part of the wisdom behind the Prophet Muhammad’s marriage to Aishah just after she reached puberty is to firmly establish this as a point of Islamic Law, even though it was already a cultural norm in all Semitic societies (including the one Jesus grew up in).[19]

Here Muslim apologists argue that Muhammad married Aisha for a divine purpose. Young girls who had questions about sex needed someone to talk to, and who better for this task than the young wife of the Prophet? Further, Muhammad wanted to establish puberty as an appropriate age for marriage, so he decided to demonstrate this rule by marrying Aisha.

RESPONSE: Muslims have failed to offer a sufficient reason for God to ordain the marriage.

There are numerous problems with this defense. First, such a response could be used to justify nearly any behavior. Consider a husband on trial for beating his wife. When he takes the stand, he explains, "Your Honor, many women are victims of spousal abuse, and they need someone to talk to. Out of the kindness of my heart, I decided to beat my wife, so that she would be able to comfort other women whose husbands beat them." Such an explanation would never be accepted (except, perhaps, in countries under Islamic rule, where the Qur’an guarantees a husband’s right to beat his wife[20]). Besides, if Muhammad had outlawed sex with children instead of becoming a willing participant, little girls wouldn’t have to worry about sex, and they wouldn’t need to question Aisha.

Second, it isn’t necessary for a lawgiver to institute laws by performing actions that create a precedent. In other words, Muhammad didn’t need to marry a young girl in order establish a law about marrying girls who had reached puberty. Muhammad, as Islam’s lawgiver, could have simply issued a decree. For instance, Muhammad allowed husbands to beat their wives. Was it necessary for Muhammad to beat his wives in order to establish this as a law? Certainly not. Similarly, when an American lawmaker says that killing someone in self-defense is acceptable, no one argues that the lawmaker must go out and kill someone in self-defense if his law is to stand. Hence, the argument that Muhammad needed to marry a young girl to establish puberty as the appropriate age for marriage completely fails.

Third, the Muslim claim that Aisha was a "precocious child" strains the evidence. Aisha herself reports that, when she was taken to Muhammad’s house, she was playing on a swing with her friends. She was also still playing with dolls. Based on the evidence, Aisha sounds like a normal little girl, not like a young adult. Besides, Muhammad didn’t marry her because she was precocious; he married her because he was dreaming about her.

Fourth, it is unlikely that God was using Muhammad’s relationship with Aisha to establish puberty as the appropriate age for marriage, since the Qur’an itself seems to allow marriage to prepubescent girls. According to Surah 65:4, a man must wait three months to divorce a wife who hasn’t yet reached menses. If Islam allows a man to divorce a girl who isn’t old enough to have her period, it follows that Islam also allows a man to marry a girl who hasn’t yet reached menses. And if the Qur’an allows marriage to prepubescent girls, then Muhammad’s marriage to Aisha would in no way rule out such a practice. (In the spirit of interpretive charity, I’m open to alternative interpretations of the Qur’an here. That is, I’m willing to give Muslims the benefit of the doubt if they offer another reasonable view of this passage. Based solely on 65:4, I would say that several interpretations of the text are possible. However, if we consider early Muslim commentaries on the verse, the understanding I give above appears strongest. To read these commentaries, click here.)

Fifth, Muslims search for reasons to justify Muhammad’s relationship with Aisha because they are convinced that everything Muhammad did had a divine purpose behind it. When critics point out Muhammad’s numerous murders and assassinations, Muslims claim that these violent acts were just. When critics note the extent of Muhammad’s polygamy, or his participation in the slave-trade, or his countless robberies,[21] Muslims provide answers based on the view that Muhammad was an outstanding moral example. Similarly, when Muslims are confronted with the evidence for Muhammad’s sexual encounters with Aisha, they assume that there must have been a reason for it. They then invent reasons for Muhammad’s behavior (i.e. the other little girls needed someone to talk to about sex), and they offer these reasons as a defense of Muhammad’s morality. However, non-Muslims do not share this confidence in Muhammad’s moral perfection. Indeed, when non-Muslims hear about Muhammad’s violence, his greed, his polygamy, and his support of spousal abuse, we aren’t as quick to say "He must have had a reason" as Muslims seem to be. Because of this, Muslim justifications for Muhammad’s marriage to Aisha sound hollow when presented as a logical defense of his actions.

Finally, Muslim explanations for Muhammad’s behavior fail to take into account the dangers that accompany sex at a young age. Many Muslims claim that, as soon as a young girl gets her first period, she is ready to bear children. This "old enough to bleed, old enough to breed" mentality, aside from being disgusting, is completely false. A nine-year-old girl isn’t ready for sex or children, even if she reaches menses earlier than other little girls. Children that young are still growing; when they become pregnant, their bodies divert nutritional resources to the developing fetus, depriving the growing girls of much-needed vitamins and minerals. Further, complications often result from adolescent pregnancies, because the bodies of the young girls simply aren’t ready to give birth.

(For a discussion of child-brides, click here.)

The West has discerned the dangers posed by adolescent pregnancies. Muslim apologists often claim that marriage to young girls was common in biblical times. This may be correct, but it is because these marriages were part of the culture, not because God endorsed them. Whereas many Christian countries have recognized the potential harms brought on by pregnancies among adolescent girls and have raised the legal age for marriage, Muslim countries are often kept from such advancements because of Muhammad. This is very interesting, for Muslims often claim that Muhammad was scientifically enlightened and that the Qur’an is a scientific masterpiece.[22] In reality, Muhammad’s marriage to Aisha is injuring young girls across the Middle East and North Africa. The dangers have even been noted by the United Nations, which issued the following report in an attempt to curb the practices supported by Islam:

Traditional cultural practices reflect values and beliefs held by members of a community for periods often spanning generations. Every social grouping in the world has specific traditional cultural practices and beliefs, some of which are beneficial to all members, while others are harmful to a specific group, such as women. These harmful traditional practices include female genital mutilation (FGM); forced feeding of women; early marriage; the various taboos or practices which prevent women from controlling their own fertility; nutritional taboos and traditional birth practices; son preference and its implications for the status of the girl child; female infanticide; early pregnancy; and dowry price. Despite their harmful nature and their violation of international human rights laws, such practices persist because they are not questioned and take on an aura of morality in the eyes of those practicing them.

Child marriage robs a girl of her childhood-time necessary to develop physically, emotionally and psychologically. In fact, early marriage inflicts great emotional stress as the young woman is removed from her parents’ home to that of her husband and in-laws. Her husband, who will invariably be many years her senior, will have little in common with a young teenager. It is with this strange man that she has to develop an intimate emotional and physical relationship. She is obliged to have intercourse, although physically she might not be fully developed.

Health complications that result from early marriage in the Middle East and North Africa, for example, include the risk of operative delivery, low weight and malnutrition resulting from frequent pregnancies and lactation in the period of life when the young mothers are themselves still growing.

Early pregnancy can have harmful consequences for both young mothers and their babies. According to UNICEF, no girl should become pregnant before the age of 18 because she is not yet physically ready to bear children. Babies of mothers younger than 18 tend to be born premature and have low body weight; such babies are more likely to die in the first year of life. The risk to the young mother’s own health is also greater. Poor health is common among indigent pregnant and lactating women.

In many parts of the developing world, especially in rural areas, girls marry shortly after puberty and are expected to start having children immediately. Although the situation has improved since the early 1980’s, in many areas the majority of girls under 20 years of age are already married and having children. Although many countries have raised the legal age for marriage, this has had little impact on traditional societies where marriage and child-bearing confer "status" on a woman.

An additional health risk to young mothers is obstructed labor, which occurs when the baby’s head is too big for the orifice of the mother. This provokes vesicovaginal fistulas, especially when an untrained traditional birth attendant forces the baby’s head out unduly.[23]

Contrary to Muslim claims, a nine-year-old girl just isn’t ready for sexual intercourse or for its possible ramifications (i.e. pregnancy, giving birth, breast-feeding, and raising a child). It is unnecessarily dangerous, for a much safer relationship could be crafted if the marriage were to take place several years later, when the girl reaches her late teens. Muslims may respond to this by arguing, "But Aisha never became pregnant, so none of this matters." Yet it does matter. Every year, countless young girls, still playing with dolls, are taken to live with much older husbands. If these husbands were to be challenged, they wouldn’t respond by saying, "But it’s part of Arabic culture"; instead, they would reply, "It can’t be wrong, because Muhammad did it." In other words, even if we grant the bizarre claim that Aisha was somehow ready for sex and marriage, most nine-year-old girls aren’t ready for sex and marriage. Yet the practice of marrying children continues to this day in many Muslim countries, largely because Muslims hold up Muhammad as their highest role model.

FOURTH MUSLIM DEFENSE: The average lifespan in Muhammad’s day was so low that people had to marry young.

Osama Abdallah argues that Muhammad’s marriage to Aisha was understandable because people in Muhammad’s day needed to marry early:

Life 1400 years ago was very rough in the too hot desert. From my personal knowledge, the average life span back then was 50 years. People used to die from all kinds of diseases. Both parents of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) for instance, died natural deaths before he even knew them.[24]

On this view, since people could die at any time in the "hot desert," they would get married at a very early age to make sure they had as many years together as possible.

RESPONSE: Muhammad was already more than fifty years old when he consummated his marriage to Aisha, so there was no need for him to marry such a young girl.

Abdallah’s claim might make sense if Muhammad had been nine or ten years old when he married Aisha. But the Prophet of Islam was already well advanced in years. He was far closer to death than any young woman he might marry, so why not marry a young woman instead of a young girl? Why not marry a fully developed twenty-year-old instead of a little girl playing on a swing? By marrying Aisha when she was so young, Muhammad was, in effect, condemning her to a life of widowhood, for the Qur’an prohibited the marrying of Muhammad’s widows (33:53). Beyond all this, Abdallah’s argument ignores the facts. Muhammad didn’t marry Aisha because the average life span was fifty years old; instead, he married her because (1) he had been dreaming about her, and (2) he had the power to persuade Abu Bakr to give him his daughter in marriage.

FIFTH MUSLIM DEFENSE: Other people have done it too—even Christians!

Abdallah also employs an "everybody’s doing it, so it’s okay" defense:

Not only was it a custom in the Arab society to Engage/Marry a young girl, it was also common in the Jewish society. The case of Mary the mother of Jesus comes to mind. In non biblical sources she was between 11-14 years old when she conceived Jesus. Mary had already been "BETROTHED" to Joseph before conceiving Jesus. Joseph was a much older man. Therefore Mary was younger than 11-14 years of age when she was "BETHROED" to Joseph. We Muslims would never call Joseph a Child Molester, nor would we refer to the "Holy Ghost" of the Bible, that "Impregnated" Mary as a "Rapist" or "Adulterer.".[25]

RESPONSE: Besides committing the "tu quoque" fallacy, this defense misses the point of the criticism against Muhammad.

Tu quoque is a type of fallacy that attempts to ignore a criticism because of some hypocrisy found in the critic. For instance, suppose I’m a thief. One day, I catch someone stealing my car, and I say, "Stop, Thief!" If the person stealing my car turns to me and says, "But you’re a thief too, so it’s not wrong for me to steal," he will be committing the tu quoque fallacy.

Muslims rely heavily on the tu quoque. When people criticize Islam for terrorism, it’s common to hear Muslims say, "But Americans are killing Arabs!" as if this were a meaningful response to the charge. Likewise, when someone says, "Look at all the people Muhammad killed," Muslims respond by saying, "But people were killed in the Bible too."

To say that Joseph married a young girl in the Bible does nothing to address the problem of Muhammad’s marriage to Aisha. At best, such a defense would only show that Christians are being inconsistent. But in reality, the Muslim defense doesn’t even show this, since their comparison fails for several reasons.

First, there is no real historical data reporting the age of Mary when she married Joseph. True, given the custom of the time, she was probably fairly young, perhaps as young as twelve or thirteen. But since we have no historical references to her age, we can’t rule out the possibility that Mary was twenty years old. The point here is this: people criticize Muhammad’s marriage to Aisha based on what we know(i.e. that Aisha was nine years old), whereas Muslims reply based on what we don’t know (i.e. the age of Mary).

Second, we must not forget that thirteen years old is very different from nine years old. Nine-year-old girls typically haven’t reached menses. In a best case scenario, a girl that young may have entered the beginning stages of puberty. A thirteen-year-old girl, on the other hand, may be coming to the end of puberty. Thus, even if we grant a young age for Mary, there would still be a world of difference between her and Aisha.

Third, Muslim apologists seem to miss the fact that Joseph is not the standard of morality in Christianity. When critics point to the age of Aisha, they are arguing something like this: "You’re trying to tell me that Muhammad was the greatest moral example of all time and that I should believe everything he says? I can’t believe that a person who would have sex with a little girl was the greatest man ever." More simply, Muhammad is foundational to Islam. If there is a problem with Muhammad, there is a problem with Islam. If Muhammad was immoral, then it becomes difficult to take his teachings seriously. Thus, it makes no sense for a Muslim to say, "Well, Joseph married a young girl too." Joseph isn’t foundational to Christianity. If an ancient text were found tomorrow, and this ancient text proved that Joseph was a thief and a murderer, this wouldn’t affect Christianity at all, because Christians don’t consider him to be a prophet, or a bringer of revelation, or even an important figure in Christianity. Thus, if Muslims want to show that Christians are being inconsistent, they need to show that Jesus, or Peter, or Paul, or someone central to Christianity, did the things that Muhammad did. Fortunately, Jesus was sinless, and the apostles lived exemplary lives once they had committed themselves to Jesus.

The internet is filled with examples of Muslims responses of this sort. Muslim websites constantly note that young girls are married in various countries and that these young girls sometimes give birth. No one doubts this. The problem is that this has nothing to do with whether or not marriage to a nine-year-old girl is morally acceptable for a mighty prophet. The fact that Muslims are forced to resort to an "everyone’s doing it" defense shows that they have run out of responses.

ASSESSMENT: While the evidence isn’t enough to condemn Muhammad as a "pedophile," his sexual relationship with Aisha is unacceptable.

Muhammad has been accused of pedophilia in numerous writings, sermons, and conversations. We have seen that the earliest Muslim traditions offer support for this view. However, the evidence sustaining the charge of pedophilia is perhaps too limited to warrant such a harsh conclusion. We know that Muhammad had a sexual relationship with a young girl, and that this was reprehensible. Yet we must take cultural differences into consideration in formulating an accurate appraisal of a person’s character. In Muhammad’s society, sexual intercourse was acceptable when a girl reached menses, and Muhammad may have waited until Aisha had reached this age. (Note: There’s no good historical evidence that Muhammad waited for Aisha to reach menses. However, I think it’s important to be generous in our interpretations as much as possible, so I’m willing to grant, for the sake of argument, that Aisha had reached puberty.)

Similarly, we don’t have enough information to call Muhammad a "pervert." While Muhammad’s sexual acts may seem startling, we don’t know enough about the nature of these acts to condemn him as a sexual deviant or a predator.

Nevertheless, Muslims are too hasty in dismissing Muhammad’s relationship with Aisha. We can’t simply ignore a prophet’s marriage to a nine-year-old girl. Muslims view Muhammad as the highest example of a moral life, but his marriage to Aisha conflicts with that view. If they want to put Muhammad forward as the standard of morality, Muslims need to come to terms with the many questionable things Muhammad did, as well as the awful impact of these actions.

There is a simple, but highly explicit, way to evaluate the importance of Muhammad’s marriage to Aisha. We must begin by trying to get a mental picture of a morally perfect man. For Muslims, this will include all the things they have been taught about Muhammad. According to their picture, he is kind, generous, patient, humble, and trustworthy. He protects orphans and widows, endures persecution, helps the needy, and promotes justice. He prays faithfully, fasts regularly, and obeys God in everything. He is loyal to his friends and patient with his enemies. He never gives in when tempted with evil. Now we must picture that same man in a room with an innocent little girl. He takes away her doll, climbs on top of her, and puts his penis inside her. She doesn’t know what is happening because she is too young to know much about sex. Frightened and confused, she cries because of the pain and bleeds on her bed, but she tries to remain quiet out of respect for her new husband, who, in return, endangers her life.

If a person is able to keep the same vision of moral perfection throughout that description, he may have the faith necessary to be a Muslim. But if his vision of the perfect man is at odds with what Muhammad did on numerous occasions, he will need to look elsewhere for an ideal human being.


[1] Maulana Muhammad Ali, Muhammad the Prophet (St. Lambert: Payette and Sims, 1993), pp. 183-184.

[2] Sahih Al-Bukhari, Dr. Muhammad Matraji, tr. (New Delhi: Islamic Book Service, 2002), Number 5133. See also 5134.

[3] Ibid., Number 3896.

[4] Ibid., Number 5158.

[5] Sahih Muslim, Abdul Hamid Siddiqi, tr., Number 3310.

[6] Ibid, Number 3311.

[7] Sahih Al-Bukhari, Number 3895. See also Number 5078.

[8] Ibid., Number 5081.

[9] Ibid., Number 3894.

[10] Ibid., Number 5160.

[11] The Qur’an commands husbands to treat their wives equally (4:3), a command that Muhammad clearly violated. Of course, the same verse also forbids husbands to marry more than four women, but Muhammad received a revelation granting him immunity from this law (33:50).

[12] Ibid., Number 2581.

[13] Ibid., Number 2967.

[14] Ibid., Number 6130.

[15] Professor Maqsood Jafri, "On The Character of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)."

[16] Abdur Rahman Squires, "The Young Marriage of Aishah."

[17] Abul A’la Mawdudi, Towards Understanding Islam (Islamic Circle of North America, 1986), pp. 53, 56.

[18] Sahih Muslim, Note 1860 (p. 716).

[19] Squires, "The Young Marriage of Aishah."

[20] According to the Quran, "Men are the maintainers of women because Allah has made some of them to excel others and because they spend out of their property; the good women are therefore obedient, guarding the unseen as Allah has guarded; and (as to) those on whose part you fear desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places and beat them; then if they obey you, do not seek a way against them; surely Allah is High, Great" (v. 4:34, M.H. Shakir Translation).

[21] For references, see "Islam Beheaded."

[22] For more on this, see "Talking Ants and Shrinking Humans."

[23] Office of the High Commissioner for Human rights, Fact Sheet No. 23, "Harmful Traditional Practices Affecting the Health of Women and Children." (Online source) The actual report is much longer than the selections quoted here.

[24] See

[25] Ibid.

Women in Islam
Articles by David Wood
Answering Islam Home Page



Status: Offline
Posts: 24624


A Salim
A Salim தலாக் முறை ஒழிக்கப்படவேண்டிய விஷயம்.

Vasim Mohamed அதை விவகாரத்து கேட்டு கோர்ட்டுக்கும்,வீட்டுக்கும் வருசக் கணக்காக அலைகிறார்களே அவர்கள் சொல்லட்டும். சாகப் போகிற கிழடுக்கு என்ன தெரியும் சளி பாய்.


Vasim Mohamed
Vasim Mohamed முஸ்லீம் பெயர் தாங்கிகள் செய்யும் காரியங்கள் எல்லாம் இஸ்லாம் ஆகி விடாது. பெண்களுக்கு வரதட்சனை ஆண்களை கட்டாயம் கொடுக்கச் சொன்ன மார்க்கம் உலகில் இஸ்லாம் மட்டுமே. வரதட்சனை கேட்பவன் முதலில் முஸ்லீமாகவே இருக்க முடியாது. தலாக் தவறு என்று நீங்கள் அறிவுப் பூர்வமாக நிரூபியுங்கள். அதை விட்டுவிட்டு முஸ்லீம் பெயர் தாங்கிகள் செய்யும் காரியங்களை எல்லாம் இஸ்லாத்தோடு முடிச்சுப் போட பார்க்காதீர்கள்.
Devapriya Solomon
Devapriya Solomon Divorce by pronouncing talaq thrice at one go is prohibited in several Islamic nations, including Turkey, Tunisia, Algeria, Iraq, Iran, Indonesia, Pakistan and Bangladesh, the book compiled by NCW member Nafisa Hussain says.
Devapriya Solomon
Devapriya Solomon Further, while in many Islamic countries, it is the right of a divorced woman to get maintenance money from her husband, in India, she has to depend on the Wakf Board for sustenance allowance.
Vasim Mohamed
Vasim Mohamed தமிழில் உரையாற்றவும்
Devapriya Solomon
Devapriya Solomon ஷரியாவை சட்டமாகக் கொண்ட பல முகம்மதிய நாடுகள் துருக்கி, ஈராக், ஈரான், அல்ஜீரியா, துனிசியா, இந்தோனேசியா, பாக்கிஸ்தான், பங்ளாதேஷ் எனப் பல நாடுகள் தலாக்கை சட்டவிரோதம் என்றாக்கிவிட்டது. தலாக் செய்தபின்னர் பெண்ணிற்கு கட்டாயமாய் நஷ்டைஇடு தரவேண்டும்
Vasim Mohamed எல்லா வேதங்களும் அந்த ஏக இறைவனிடம் இருந்து அநத தூதர்களுக்கு அருளப்பட்டதுதான். அந்த வேதத்தை பாழ்படுத்தி விட்டார்கள். இறுதிவேதம் அவனிடமிருந்து வந்ததுதான் அவன் அனுப்பிய தூதர்களை அவன் அதில் மதகுருமார்களின் பித்தலாட்டங்களை இறுதிவேதத்தில் போட்டு உடைத்தால் அதற்குபெயர் காப்பியா
Devapriya Solomon
Devapriya Solomon ஐயா யூதர்கள் புனைந்தது கட்டுக் கதை.கதைப்படி வந்தேறி இப்ராகிம் வாரிசு எபிரேயர்கள் மண்ணின் மைந்தர்களை இனப்படுகொலை செய்து ஆக்கிரமிப்பு செய்ததாய் கதை. அதையே எடுத்து இன்னொரு மொழியில் இயற்றினால் அது இறை வார்த்தை என்பவரை என்ன சொல்வது.
Vasim Mohamed
Vasim Mohamed நீங்கள் சொல்லும் கதை குர்ஆனில் எந்த இடத்தில் வருகிறது ஆதாரம் தரமுடியுமா?
Devapriya Solomon
Devapriya Solomon எபிரேயர்கள் எகிப்திருந்து வெளியேற்றம், சாக்கடல் வழி உட்டது ரீல்கள் மட்டுமே 80க்கும் மேற்பட்ட முறை குரான் பைபிள் கட்டுகதையிலிருந்து சுட்டு போடப்பட்டுள்ளது.
இன்று வரை எபிரேயர்கள் எகிப்தில் வாழ்ந்தார்கள் என்பதற்கு ஆதாரம் கிடையாது.
சுலைமான் நபியின் காலத்தி...See More
Devapriya Solomon
Write a reply...
Vasim Mohamed
Vasim Mohamed இஸ்லாம் கூறும் ஜீவனாம்சம் திருமணத்திற்கு முன் மஹர் தொகை தான் அதுதான் வரதட்சணை. விவகாரத்திற்குப் பின்னும் கொடுக்கச் சொல்வது மனிதச் சட்டம். அந்தப் பெண் கர்ப்பமாக இருந்தால் அதுவரை அந்த கணவனின் பொறுப்பு பிறகு கிடையாது. நீங்கள் குர்ஆனை விமர்ச்சியுங்கள். முஸ்லீம் நாடுகள் செய்வதையோ,முஸ்லீம் பெயர் தாங்கிகளின் நடைமுறையையோ இஸ்லாத்தோடு முடிச்சுப் போடாதீர்கள் திரும்பவும் சொல்கிறேன்
Devapriya Solomon
Devapriya Solomon ஒருவன் வளர்ப்பு மகனின் மனைவியை பார்த்துவிட, ஆசைப்பட, அம்மனிதனூக்காக வஹி இறக்குவார் என நம்பினால்- பாவம் நீங்கள்
Vasim Mohamed
Vasim Mohamed இஸ்லாத்தை ஆய்வு செய்யாமல் Net ல் இருப்பவற்றை சுட்டு அதையே நம்பி வண்டி ஓட்டினால் இப்படித்தான் பாவம். வாழ்வில் ஒருமுறை குர்ஆனை அதன் பொருள் உணர்ந்து படித்து பிறகு வாதாட வாருங்கள். அப்பத்தான் அசிங்கப்படாமல் இருப்பீர்கள் சரியா.
Devapriya Solomon
Devapriya Solomon எனக்கு விஞ்ஞான ரீதியிலான ஏற்கப்பட்ட, தொல்லியல் புதிபொருள் அகழ்வுகள் உறுதிபடுத்திய வரலாறு தேவை. அருவருப்பான பாலைவனக் கட்டுகதைகள், வரலாற்றில் பொய் என்பவைகள் எதற்கு? பொய்யும் குறையுமாய் வாதம் செய்வோருக்கே அவமானம். உங்களுக்கு மத விசுவாசம் முக்கியம் - உண்மை தேவையில்லை எனில் வாதமே அவசியம் இல்லை
Vasim Mohamed
Vasim Mohamed கட்டுக்கதை என்கிறீர்கள். முகமதுநபி வளர்ப்புமகனின் மனைவி திருமணத்தை மட்டும் உங்க ஒப்பாரிக்கு தேவைப்படுது. அப்ப உண்மைச் சம்பவம் ஏன் இந்த முரண். சுயநினைவோடு பேசுங்கள். முகமதுநபி பிறந்து வளர்ந்தது எல்லாவற்றுக்கும் ஆதாரம் உண்டு. வரலாறுகளாக பாதுகாக்கப்பட்டு அவர்களின் ஒவ்வொரு அசைவும் இன்றளவும் பின்பற்றப்படும் ஒரு தலைவரின் வரலாறு கட்டுக்கதையா. மைக்கேல் ஹார்ட் என்னும் அறிஞர் The 100என்ற நூலில் வரலாற்றை 23ஆண்டுகளில் புரட்டிப் போட்ட மனிதர்களில் முகமதுநபிக்கே முதலிடம் கொடுத்து இருக்கிறார். பாவம் உங்களுக்கு தெரியாதது வேதனையான விசயம் தான்.மக்காவில் கிடைக்கும் ஜம்ஜம் நீர் உங்க தொல்பொருள் ஆய்வாளர்களுக்கும்,உங்களுக்கும் கண்களுக்கும் தெரியாமல் போனது ஏனோ?
Devapriya Solomon
Devapriya Solomon நடுநிலை வரலாற்று ஆசிரியர்கள் ஏற்கும்படிக்கு முகம்மது வாழ்விற்கு எவ்வித ஆதாரமும் கிடையாது, ஏசுவைப் போலவே. அப்படி வாழ்ந்திருந்தால் ஒரு கேவலமான முன்மாதிரி என்றும் தான் உள்ளது. 
Germany -- Muhammad Sven Kalisch, a Muslim convert and Germany's first profess...See More
Devapriya Solomon's photo.

-- Edited by Admin on Monday 1st of August 2016 08:43:45 PM

-- Edited by Admin on Monday 1st of August 2016 08:47:48 PM



Status: Offline
Posts: 24624

Vasim Mohamed அரபியில் பெயர் உள்ளவர்கள் செய்யும் காரியங்களை எல்லாம் இஸ்லாத்தை அதில் இணைத்து குளிர் காய நினைப்பது வெட்கக்கேடு. பாவம் உங்களுக்கு இஸ்லாத்தை குறை சொல்ல இது போன்ற செய்திகளைத்தான் சேகரிக்க வேண்டி இருக்கிறது. இந்தப் பொழப்புக்கு வேற தொழில் செய்யலாம். கன்னிப்பெண்ணாயினும்,விதவையாயினும் பெண்ணிடம் சம்மதம் கேட்டு தான் மணமுடிக்க வேண்டும் என்று சொன்ன மார்க்கம் உலகில் இஸ்லாம் மட்டுமே ஆகும். இஸ்லாத்தின் அடிச்சுவடி கூடத் தெரியாத உங்களைப் போன்ற கழிசடைகளுக்கு இது எல்லாம் எப்படித் தெரியும். தெரிந்தால் இதை இஸ்லாத்தோடு ஒப்பிடுவீர்களா Shree Garudaazhvaan,Devapriya Solomon.உடனே அக்கா டிரைலர் போட்டுவிட்டுடாக அவர்களின் சொந்தக்காரங்க தயாரித்த குரும்படத்தை. அது சரி அந்த கிழவன் கல்யாணம் பண்ணிக்கிட்டது உங்க இரண்டுபேர் குழந்தை இல்லையே. பாவம் ரொம்ப கவலைப்படுறீங்க. பல்லு இருக்கிறவன் பக்கோடா சாப்பிடுறான் இதுல உங்களுக்கு என்ன பிரச்சினை. உங்க பிள்ளைகளை கல்யாணம் பண்ணலைன்னு கவலையா அய்யோ பாவம்.

Vasim Mohamed //அது சரி அந்த கிழவன் கல்யாணம் பண்ணிக்கிட்டது உங்க இரண்டுபேர் குழந்தை இல்லையே. பாவம் ரொம்ப கவலைப்படுறீங்க. பல்லு இருக்கிறவன் பக்கோடா சாப்பிடுறான் இதுல உங்களுக்கு என்ன பிரச்சினை. உங்க பிள்ளைகளை கல்யாணம் பண்ணலைன்னு கவலையா அய்யோ பாவம்// 53 வயது முகம்மது நபி 6 வயது ஆயிஷாவோடு திருமணம், ஆயிஷாவின் 9வயதில் பொம்மையோடு விளையாடிய போது உறவு எனும்கற்பழிப்பு எனில் அந்த இடத்தில் உங்களை -உங்கள் சகோதரியை என நான் எழுத இருந்தேன்- ஆபிரகாமிய மதங்கள் ஒரு மனோவியாதியை உருவாக்குகின்றன என ஹாவர்ட் பல்கலைக் கழக ஆய்வு கூறியதை சகோதரர் பேச்சு நிருபிக்கிறது.- நண்பரே //உங்க இரண்டுபேர் குழந்தை இல்லையே//இன்று இந்தியாவில் உள்ள முகம்மதியரில் 60% மக்கள் கட்டாயமாக பெண்களைக் கடத்தி 2 - 3ம் மனைவியாய் ஆக்கி கொண்டு அதில் பெருகியோர். மேலும் ஒரு பாலைவன மத கதையைக் கொண்டு மாற்று மதத்தினர் கண்டிப்பாக ஜிஸ்யா வரிபோட, கட்ட முடியாமல் மாறியோர் என. -குரானின் அடிப்படை இப்ராகிம் - மூசா- தாவூது - சுலைமான் என்போர் கதைகள், இவை அனைத்தும் கட்டுக் கதைகள் என பூமிக்கு அடியில் தோண்டிய இஸ்ரேல் - எகிப்து தொல்லியல் அகழ்வாய்வுகள் தெளிவுபடுத்திவிட்டது. குரான் யூதன் கூறிய கற்பனைக் கதைகளை மேலும் நீட்டி வளர்த்த இன்னொரு பாலைவன மனிதக் கைகள் என்பது தெளிவு


ஒன்று என்னுடைய ஆய்வு வரலாற்று நோக்கம் மனிதம், இவ்விரண்டுமே இல்லாததும் மேலும் உங்களின் நம்பிக்கையில் உயர்ந்தவர், அவரை சோன்னால் தனிப்பட்ட முறையில் எடுத்துக் கொள்ளும்போது நான் இதை தவிர்க்க விரும்புகிறேன். என்னைப் பொருத்தவரை உலகில் உள்ள அனைத்து நூல்களுமே மனிதப் புனையல்கள் தான், அது எகிப்து, இஸ்ரேல், சௌதி போன்ற இடங்களின் தொல்லியல் அகழ்வாயுவுகள் நிருபிக்கிறது. என் ஆய்வு எல்லை இப்ராகிம் முதல் ஈசா வரை ஆயினும் என் ஆய்வின்வலைப்பூவில் பல நண்பர்கள் பலர் முகம்மதிய இணைப்புகளைக் கொடுக்க அதில் சிலவற்றை நாம் படித்தோம். ஒரு அரேபி சொல்லை 1300 வருடமாய் மொழி பெயர்த்து புரிந்த விதமாய் தான் இன்றும் செய்ய இயலும். ஆனால் அறிவியல் மாற்றினால் - இல்லாத பொருளை சொல்வதாய் வகாபிய பீஜே - ஸாஹிர் நாயக் போன்றோர் பயன்பாட்டைக் கொண்டு குரானிற்கும் ஹத்திஸிற்கும் இல்லாத பொருள் தருவதும் நடைமுறை ஆய் உள்ளது. இவற்றில் நம்க்கு உடன்பாடு இல்லை. ஆயிஷா கதைக்கு அத்தனை ஹத்திஸ் ஆதாரமோடு கட்டுரை இங்கே உள்ளது, அங்கே உங்கள் பதிலைப் பதியுங்கள், இணைப்பைத் தாருங்கள்.

I want your response there and not here.


Vasim Mohamed பாவம் நீங்கதான் எப்பப் பார்த்தாலும் மண்ணுக்குள்ள போறதையும்,வருவதையும் பேசிப்பேசியே மனநோயாளி போல் மாறிவிட்டீர்கள். எதற்கெடுத்தாலும் லிங்க் இன்னும் கொஞ்சநாள்ள இப்படியே போனால் உங்களுக்கு சங்குதான்


Like · Reply · 3 mins

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to

Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard