New Indian-Chennai News + more

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: K.G.Balakrishanan- former CJI SCANDALS


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9863
Date:
K.G.Balakrishanan- former CJI SCANDALS
Permalink  
 


29_12_2010_001_074-kgb-son-reliance.jpg?w=369&h=794

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9863
Date:
Permalink  
 

kgb.jpg?w=640&h=375

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9863
Date:
Permalink  
 

30_12_2010_008_016-kgb-cpm.jpg?w=640&h=485

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9863
Date:
Permalink  
 

Ex-CJI's kin quits Youth Congress
P.V. Sreenijan, sonin-law of former Chief Justice of India K.G.
Balakrishnan, has resigned from the Youth Congress following allegations that he amassed assets beyond his known means.

Youth Congress state president P.C. Vishnunath told reporters that he had accepted the resignation of Mr Sreenijan, who was formerly vice-president of the organisation. He add-ed that the internal inquiry ordered by the YC leadership into the assets of Mr Sreenijan would continue.

In a statement released later, Mr Sreenijan said he had purchased land with the help of bank loans and the fee which he and his wife had got as advocates.
"Please don't hunt my family and please don't drag the name of my father-in-law into all this," he said in the statement.

"I am ready to face any probe," he added.

Meanwhile, Kannur Congress MP K. Sudhakaran alleged that the CPI(M) had sought "favours" of Mr Sreenijan many a time and that was the reason for the Marxist leadership's silence on the issue.
"The CPI(M) has an unholy relationship with him," said the MP, who added that the party had silenced its MLA, Mr M.V. Jayarajan, and the DYFI leader, Mr M.B.
Rajesh, who initially spoke out against Mr Sreenijan and Mr Balakrishnan.



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9863
Date:
Permalink  
 

05_01_2011_001_008-kgb.jpg?w=349&h=919

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9863
Date:
Permalink  
 

Ex-CJI kin in soup over Rs 3cr assetsAnanthakrishnan G, TNN, Jan 3, 2011, 05.07am IST

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM: After his son-in-lawNational Human Rights Commission chairman and former Chief Justice Justice of India K G Balakrishnan's brother, K G Bhaskaran, is in the middle of a controversy over his assets. 

Investigations by local TV channels on Sunday revealed that Bhaskaran and his family own a farm spread over 60 acres in Tamil Nadu's Dindigul. The farm is registered in the name of Bhaskaran, his wife and kin in five separate deeds registered in the Attur Sub Registrar office. The property was registered in 2005 and 2007. Purchased for about Rs 22 lakh, the farm's market price is now estimated to be over Rs 3 crore. This is besides property and houses Bhaskaran owns in Kerala's Eranakulam district. 

Bhaskaran is a government pleader and his wife a retired judicial magistrate. He rubbished suggesitions about his disproportionate assests, saying that the family had bought the farm with its saving. "I deal with arbitration matters and have private cases and get paid for that," he said. 

He wondered why there was so much hue and cry over properties of Balakrishnan's family and claimed that it was part of a design to target the former CJI. "The way media reports it, it seems we can't own any property. Apparently, they want us to be like our ancestors — at the mercy of the landlords and living on their grants," he said, and added that it amounted to questioning the entire Dalit community of which he was a part. 

He said the attempts to "target" them was part of a "larger design".


Read more: Ex-CJI kin in soup over Rs 3cr assets - The Times of India http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/thiruvananthapuram/Ex-CJI-kin-in-soup-over-Rs-3cr-assets/articleshow/7208098.cms#ixzz1ACqccud4


__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9863
Date:
Permalink  
 

Ex-CJI Balakrishnans 2nd son-in-law also in trouble

Ananthakrishnan G | TNN

Thiruvananthapuram: Embarrassment for the former Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan mounted on Tuesday when the name of his second son-in-law,M J Benny,surfaced in land deals worth more than Rs 80 lakh.The revelations followed Kerala home minister Kodiyeri Balakrishnan calling for action on chief minister V S Achuthanandans recommendation for a vigilance probe into the ex-CJIs first son-in-law P V Sreenijans allegedly unaccounted wealth.
Significantly,Balakrishnans brother K G Bhaskaran,who is a special government pleader in the high court,was summoned by advocate general C P Sudhakara Prasad on Tuesday,seeking to know the veracity of the charge that he and his family owned large tracts of land in Tamil Nadu and Ernakulam.Bhaskaran met him and is now on leave.
According to revenue records,Benny,a practising lawyer,bought over 96 cents of land in five separate transactions in Maradu village in Ernakulam between 2008 and 2010 for Rs 81.5 lakh.
These plots were registered at the Maradu sub-registrars office.While 6.5 cents (100 cents equal one acre) were purchased for Rs 9.5 lakh in March 2008,another plot of the same measure was bought a month later for Rs 2 lakh.In March 2009,Benny bought 31.5 cents of land for Rs 39.56 lakh and 7.9 cents for Rs 8 lakh three months later.On March 26,2010,Benny struck another deal for 44.5 cents at Rs 22.25 lakh.
Benny is from Nettoor in the Maradu area,a fast developing Kochi suburb.

All In The Family




Ex-CJIs second son-in-law M J Benny purchased land worth more than Rs 80 lakh;his annual income is 6 lakh




State home ministry moves for vigilance probe against first sonin-law P V Sreenijan for disproportionate wealth




Ex-CJIs brother K G Bhaskaran,spl govt pleader in HC,goes on leave after being questioned on family owning huge tracts of land in Tamil Nadu & Kerala



Pc0012900.jpg

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9863
Date:
Permalink  
 

WASHING HIS HANDS OFF 


Dont drag me into my kins affairs: Ex-CJI


Now second son-in-law,M J Benny,is caught in a row over land deals worth more than Rs 80 lakh.
Interestingly,reports quoting income tax authorities said Bennys income was not more than Rs 6 lakh pa in 2008-09.
Meanwhile,NHRC chairman K G Balakrishnan said it was regrettable that his name was being dragged into the controversy surrounding his son-in-laws.The former CJIs defence appeared in a Malayalam weekly,Kerala Shabdam.He said he had heard about Sreenijan buying riverside land in Thrissur and constructing a building there using a bank loan,but knew nothing more about it.Refusing to defend Sreenijan,he called for an independent probe to establish guilt,if any,and added that it was morally wrong if a public servant had assets disproportionate to his known source of income.He also said he was not obliged to reply on behalf of Sreenijan.
On the charges that he favoured Uttar Pradesh chief minister Mayawati in the Noida park case,Balakrishnan said the final judgement in that matter had come two months after he retired.He also denied having dealt with any case concerning former Samajwadi Party general secretary Amar Singh.

Pc0101700.jpg




__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9863
Date:
Permalink  
 

06_01_2011_001_054-kgb.jpg?w=614&h=446

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9863
Date:
Permalink  
 

06_01_2011_009_005-kgb1.jpg?w=640&h=313

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9863
Date:
Permalink  
 

14_01_2011_008_035-sc-contempt.jpg?w=385&h=719

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9863
Date:
Permalink  
 

14_01_2011_010_008-judges-pf-arrest.jpg?w=362&h=500

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9863
Date:
Permalink  
 

13_01_2011_008_004-kgb.jpg?w=640&h=170

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9863
Date:
Permalink  
 

20_01_2011_010_024-kgbalakrishnan1.jpg?w=640&h=689

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9863
Date:
Permalink  
 

24_01_2011_007_005-kgb.jpg?w=640&h=241

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9863
Date:
Permalink  
 

24_01_2011_007_052-kgb.jpg?w=640&h=303

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9863
Date:
Permalink  
 

28_02_2011_002_011-kgb.jpg?w=640&h=223

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9863
Date:
Permalink  
 

27_02_2011_009_045-kgb.jpg?w=357&h=817

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9863
Date:
Permalink  
 

05_03_2011_007_058-kgb.jpg?w=365&h=602

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9863
Date:
Permalink  
 

20110419a_007101006-kgb.jpg?w=640&h=513



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9863
Date:
Permalink  
 

20110509a_007101006-kg-balakrishnan.jpg?w=640&h=565



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9863
Date:
Permalink  
 

Another “Dalit” turns out to be a Christian

Vatican stooge K G Balakrishnan Exposed by Kerala SC – ST federation
31/12/2010 10:22:08  HK

Kochi: Kerala SC – ST federation  Advocate K V Kumaran, revealed explosive information about former Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan and his family. As revealed K G Balakrishnan is a Crypto Christian planted by Vatican as part of their global evangelisation agenda.

K G Balakrishnan’s daughter and son in law Sri Nijan was sponsored by World Council of Church to complete higher education in law in London. World Council of Church is a Vatican sponsored organisation with an annual budget of  145 Billion dollar and their aim is global evangelisation.

K G Balakrishnan’s father was one Mr Lookose who changed his name as Gopinathan to usurp the benefits of SC-ST Hindus.He later got retired in a high post from Kerala High court.

K G Balakrishnan was a pawn planted by Vatican to take favourable verdict for converted Christians in a case registered in 2004 with case number 180. Once get a favourable verdict converted Christians can get all benefits granted by Constitution to SC-ST Hindus. By this Vatican can intensify their conversion agenda. The forces who stand for Ranganatha Mishra report is also sponsored by Vatican and aims to bring constitution amendment to extend reservations to converted Christians.

A Memorandum was submitted by Kerala SC-ST Federation in 2006 to Indian President and copy of it were given to Prime Minister and CBI Director with full evidences that K G Balakrishnan is a Crypto christian who grabbed the benefits of genuine SC-ST Hindus. 

Sri Nijan who is now exposed by Asianet was a Congres candidate in Njarrakkal in a SC-ST reserved seat. Sri Nijan is a practicing Christian who even openly went to worship in Church even on poll day making mockery of law of land. These fake name sake Hindus should be exposed and is doing more harm to SC- ST Hindus.

K G Balakrishnan was made High Court judge with special recruitment by former president K R Narayanan. K G Balakrishnan’s brother another Crypto Christian Advocate K G Bhaskaran was earlier suspended from practice for taking bribe when his wife was Magistrate.Later this suspension was revoked following the interference of K G Balakrishnan. This tainted Advocate K G Bhaskaran was made Government pleader by Achuthanandan Government in Kerala. The complete silence of CPM over this KGB episode owe to their links with this tainted family.

Kerala SC-ST federation Executive Member C C Gangadharan was also present during the press meet called by advocate K V Kumaran.



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9863
Date:
Permalink  
 

நீதிபதி கே.ஜி. பாலகிருஷ்ணன் சொத்து குறித்து விசாரிக்க உத்தரவு
 
First Published : 22 Jun 2011 08:12:19 PM IST


 
புதுதில்லி, ஜூன் 22- உச்சநீதிமன்ற முன்னாள் தலைமை நீதிபதி கே.ஜி. பாலகிருஷ்ணன் அளவுக்கு அதிகமாக சொத்து சேர்த்துள்ளாரா என்பது குறித்து விசாரணை நடத்துமாறு வருவாய் புலனாய்வுத் துறையினருக்கு மத்திய அரசு உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது.

 

 

இதற்கான உத்தரவை உள்துறை அமைச்சகம் பிறப்பித்துள்ளது.

 

 

கேரள மாநிலத்தைச் சேர்ந்த ஒருவர் மத்திய உள்துறை அமைச்சகத்துக்கு அனுப்பிய புகாரின் அடிப்படையில் இவ்வாறு உத்தரவு பிறப்பிக்கப்பட்டுள்ளது.

 

 

நீதிபதி கே.ஜி. பாலகிருஷ்ணன் தற்போது தேசிய மனித உரிமைகள் ஆணையத் தலைவராக பதவி வகிக்கிறார் என்பது குறிப்பிடத்தக்கது.


__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9863
Date:
Permalink  
 

 

சிக்கலில் கே.ஜி.பாலகிருஷ்ணனும், வருத்தத்தில் கிருஷ்ண அய்யரும்!

 vedaprakash

 “தலித் சமுதாயத்தைச் சேர்ந்த கே.ஜி.பாலகிருஷ்ணன் உச்சநீதிமன்ற தலைமை நீதிபதியாகப் பொறுப்பேற்றபோது நான் புதிய அத்தியாயம் பிறந்ததாக மகிழ்ந்தேன். ஆனால் இப்போது நாம் ஏன் நீதிபதியாக இருந்தோம் என்று வருத்தமடைகிறேன். கே.ஜி.பாலகிருஷ்ணன் குடும்பத்தினர் பெருமளவில் சொத்துக்களைக் குவித்ததாக புகார்கள் கிளம்பியுள்ளன. இதுகுறித்து தீவிரமாக விசாரிக்கப்பட வேண்டும்”, என்று முன்னாள் உச்சநீதிமன்ற நீதிபதி வி.ஆர்.கிருஷ்ணய்யர் கோரிக்கை விடுத்துள்ளார்[1]. இவர்கள் எல்லோருமே கேரளாவைச் சேர்ந்தவர்கள் என்று குறிப்பிடத் தக்கது. இவரை அடுத்து நீதித்துறையைச் சேர்ந்த  மற்றவர்களும், இதைப் பற்றி விசாரிக்க உத்தரவு இடவேண்டும் என்று கேட்டிருக்கிறார்கள்[2].

 

பாலகிருஷ்ணின் குடும்பத்தினரின் சொத்து விவரங்கள்[3]: கேரளாவின் ஒரு டிவி சேனலில் ( Asianet TV channel[4]) கே.ஜி.பாலகிருஷ்ணன் குடும்பத்தினர் பெருமளவில் சொத்துக்களைக் குவித்துள்ளதாகவும், பல்வேறு நகரங்களில் மிகப் பெரிய அளவுக்கு அவர்கள் சொத்துக்களை சட்டத்திற்குப் புறம்பாக வாங்கி குவித்துள்ளதாகவும் செய்தி வெளியானதால் பெரும் பரபரப்பு ஏற்பட்டது. DYFI அவர்மீது உரிய நடவடிக்கை ந்டுக்க வேண்டும் என்று கூறியுள்ளது. அதுமட்டுமல்லாது, இப்பொழுதுள்ள பதவியிலிருந்தும் விலக வேண்டும் என்று கூறியுள்ளது.

 

ஏ. ராஜா- கே. வீரமணி – பாலகிருஷ்ணன் சம்பத்தை ஆராய வேண்டும்: சமீபத்தில் சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்ற ஓய்வு பெற்ற நீதிபதி ரகுபதியை முன்னாள் அமைச்சர் ராசா மிரட்டியதாக எழுந்த சர்ச்சையில் கே.ஜி.பாலகிருஷ்ணன் பெயரும் அடிபட்டது. ராசாவை காப்பாற்றும் நோக்கில் அவர் செயல்பட்டதாகவும் சர்ச்சைகள் வெடித்தன. ராசாவின் பெயரைக் குறிப்பிட்டு கே.ஜி.பாலகிருஷ்ணனுக்கு கடிதம் போனதாக ரகுபதி கூறினார்[5].ஆனால் அதை பாலகிருஷ்ணன் மறுத்தார். ஆனால் ரகுபதி எழுதிய கடிதத்தை நான்தான் பாலகிருஷ்ணனுக்கு அனுப்பி வைத்தேன் என்று விளக்கினார் ஓய்வு பெற்ற சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்ற தலைமை நீதிபதி எச்.எல்.கோகலே. இதனால் பாலகிருஷ்ணன் சர்ச்சையில் சிக்கினார். இந்த நிலையில் பாலகிருஷ்ணனின் குடும்பம் சொத்துக் குவிப்பு சர்ச்சையில் சிக்கியுள்ளது. இதுகுறித்து கிருஷ்ணய்யர் அதிர்ச்சி தெரிவித்துள்ளார். ஓய்வு பெற்ற உச்சநீதிமன்ற நீதிபதியான கிருஷ்ணய்யர், இந்தியாவின் முன்னணி மனித உரிமை ஆர்வலரும் கூட. தூக்குத் தண்டனைக்கு எதிராக தீவிரமாக குரல் கொடுத்து வருபவர்.

 

கிருஷ்ண அய்யர் வருத்தப் பட்டுக் கூறியது! பாலகிருஷ்ணன் குடும்பத்தினர் மீதான புகார்கள் குறித்து அவர் கூறுகையில், “நான் நீதிபதியாக இருந்தேன் என்பது இப்போது எனக்கு அருவெறுப்பாக உள்ளது. தலித் சமுதாயத்தைச் சேர்ந்த கே.ஜி.பாலகிருஷ்ணன் தலைமை நீதிபதியாக உயர்ந்தபோது புதிய அத்தியாயம் மலர்ந்துள்ளதாக பெருமைப்பட்டேன். ஆனால் இப்போது அப்படி நான் நினைக்கவில்லை.

 

பாலகிருஷ்ணனின் மகள்மருமகன்மாமியார் மீது ஊழல் புகார்கள் எழுந்துள்ளன. இதுகுறித்து தலைமை நீதிபதிகள் அடங்கிய கமிஷனை அமைத்து தீவிரமாக விசாரிக்க மத்திய அரசு உத்தரவிட வேண்டும். பாலகிருஷ்ணன் மற்றும் அவரது குடும்பத்தினர்உறவினர்களின் சொத்துக்கள்அவருடைய வங்கி கணக்கு விவரங்கள் குறித்து விரிவாக விசாரிக்கப்பட வேண்டும்.இந்த விசாரணைக் கமிஷனை பிரதமர் உடனடியாக அமைக்க வேண்டும். இதற்கு நாடாளுமன்றம் விரைவாக ஒப்புதல் தர வேண்டும். மேலும்தற்போது தேசிய மனித உரிமை ஆணையத்தின் தலைவராக உள்ள கே.ஜி.பாலகிருஷ்ணன் உடனடியாக பதவி விலக வேண்டும் என குடியரசுத் தலைவர் உத்தரவிட வேண்டும், என்றார் கிருஷ்ணய்யர்.

 

130% மடங்கு எப்படி உயர்ந்துள்ள சொத்துக்கள்: பாலகிருஷ்ணனின் மருமகன் ஸ்ரீனிஜின் (P V Sreenijin) கேரள மாநில காங்கிரஸ் கட்சியில் உள்ளார். இவர் 2006ம் ஆண்டு சட்டசபைத் தேர்தலில் நரக்கல் தொகுதியிலிருந்து போட்டியிட்டார். அப்போது அவர் வேட்பு மனுவுடன் தாக்கல் செய்த சொத்துக் கணக்கு விவரத்தில், ஒரு சொத்தும் தனது பெயரில் கிடையாது என்றும், மனைவியிடம் வெறும் ரூ. 4.38 லட்சம் பெறுமானமுள்ள நகைகளும், ரூ. 1 லட்சம் ரொக்கமும் மட்டுமே இருப்பதாக குறிப்பிட்டிருந்தார். ஆனால் 3 ஆண்டுகள் கழித்து ஸ்ரீனிஜினும் அவரது மனைவி சோனியும் ( K B Sony) (இருவரும் வக்கீல்கள்) வருமான வரித்துறையிடம் தாக்கல் செய்த ரிட்டர்ன் படிவத்தில், ரூ. 35 லட்சம் சொத்து இருப்பதாக தெரிவித்துள்ளனர்.  ஆனால் தற்போது இவர்கள் வசம் பல கோடி ரூபாய் மதிப்புள்ள சொத்துக்கள் இருப்பதாக தெரிய வந்துள்ளது[6]. திருச்சூரில் மிகப் பெரிய ரிசார்ட் ஒன்றையும் இவர்கள் கட்டி வருகின்றனராம்.  இவர்கள் வசம் தற்போது உள்ள சொத்துக்களின் மதிப்பு, அவர்கள் பதிவு செய்தபோது சொன்ன தொகையை விட பல மடங்கு அதிகமாகுமாம். 130% மடங்கு எப்படி உயர்ந்துள்ளது என்பது வியப்பாக உள்ளது என்று உள்ளூர் மக்களே வியக்கின்றனராம்! நான்காண்டுகளுக்கு முன்பு வங்கியில் மிகச்சிறிதே பணம் இருந்ட நிலையில், இப்படி கோடிக்கணக்கான சொத்துக்களை எப்படி வாங்கிக் குவித்துள்ளார் என்று கேள்வி எழுந்துள்ளது. மேலும் இப்பணம் தங்களது தொழிற் ஆலோசனை சேவை (‘professional consultancy’) மூலம்[7] வந்தாகக் கூறுகின்றனராம்!

 

துபாய், பங்களூரு கனெக்க்ஷன்ஸ் / தொடர்புகள்: கே.ஜி.பாலகிருஷ்ணன் குடும்பத்தினரின் சொத்து விவரங்கள் குறித்து தற்போது தெரிய வந்துள்ளவை மிகச் சிறிய அளவிலானவைதான். உரிய விசாரணை நடத்தினால் மிகப் பெரிய ஊழலையும், சொத்துக் குவிப்பையும் நாட்டு மக்கள் அறிய முடியும் என்று மார்க்சிஸ்ட் கம்யூனிஸ்ட் கட்சியின் இளைஞர் பிரிவு மாநிலத் தலைவர் ராஜேஷ் கூறியுள்ளார். அவர் கூறுகையில், துபாய், பெங்களூரில் பாலகிருஷ்ணன் குடும்பத்தினரும், உறவினர்களும் மிகப் பெரிய அளவில் சொத்துக்களைக் குவித்துள்ளனர். தமிழகத்திலும் பெரிய அளவில் அவர்கள் சொத்துக்களை வைத்துள்ளனர். பாலகிருஷ்ணன்தான் இந்த சொத்துக் குவிப்பின் மையப் புள்ளியாக தெரிகிறார். எனவே இதுகுறித்து விரிவான விசாரணை நடத்தப்பட வேண்டியது அவசியமாகும் என்றார்.

 

டில்லி பத்திரிக்கையாளர் கொடுத்துள்ள புகார்! சமீபத்தில் டெல்லியைச் சேர்ந்த பத்திரிக்கையாளர் பர்குவான் என்பவர், கடந்த ஜூன் மாதம் துணைக் குடியரசுத் தலைவர் ஹமீத் அன்சாரிக்கு ஒரு கடிதம் எழுதியிருந்தார். அதில், பாலகிருஷ்ணன் மற்றும் அவரது குடும்பத்தினருக்கு பெருமளவில் சொத்துக்கள் உள்ளன. இவை பாலகிருஷ்ணன், உச்சநீதிமன்ற தலைமை நீதிபதியான பின்னர்தான் வாங்கப்பட்டுள்ளன. எனவே இதுகுறித்து சிபிஐ விசாரணை நடத்தப்பட வேண்டும் என்று அவர் கூறியிருந்தார். இந்தப் புகார் கடிதத்தை உள்துறை அமைச்சகத்திற்கு அனுப்பி வைத்தார் அன்சாரி. உள்துறை அமைச்சகம் அக்கடிதத்தை சிபிஐக்கு அனுப்பியது. தற்போது இக்கடிதம் சிபிஐயின் கொச்சி அலுவலகத்தில் இருப்பதாக கூறப்படுகிறது.

 

வேதபிரகாஷ்

© 28-12-2010


[5] நீதித்துறையில் அமைச்சர் ராஜா தலையிட்டதாக கூறப்படும் விவகாரத்தில், சிலரை காப்பாற்றுவதற்காக தன்னை யாரும் நிர்ப்பந்தி்க்க வில்லை என முன்னாள் சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட் தலைமை நீதிபதி கே.ஜி. பாலகிருஷ்ணன் தெரிவித்துள்ளார். நீதித்துறையில் அமைச்சர் ராஜா தலையிட்டதாக, அப்போதைய சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட் தலைமை நீதிபதி கே.ஜி. பாலகிருஷ்ணனுக்கு அப்போதைய சென்னை ஐகோர்ட் தலைமை நீதிபதி கோகலே ஒரு அறிக்கை அனுப்பி இருந்தார். இதற்கு மறுப்பு தெரிவித்துள்ள பாலகிருஷ்ணன், கோகலே தனக்கு அனுப்பிய அறிக்கையுடன் இருந்த கடிதத்தில் எந்த அமைச்சர் பெயரையும் குறிப்பிடவில்லை எனவும், இவ்விவகாரத்தில் தன்னை இது தொடர்பாக எவரும் நிர்ப்பந்திக்கவில்லை என்றும் தெரிவித்தார்.http://www.dinamalar.com/News_Detail.asp?Id=146523

 

 



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9863
Date:
Permalink  
 

04_08_2011_010_007-kgb1.jpg?w=640&h=267



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9863
Date:
Permalink  
 

KGBs kin amassed 9cr 

T Ramavarman TNN 

Kochi: Income Tax officials estimate that the two sons-in-law of former Chief Justice of India (CJI) Justice K G Balakrishnan,and one of their business associates,made Rs 9 crore from undervalued property deals in the past two years.Even though IT authorities had earlier confirmed that KGBS kin P V Sreenijan and K V Benny possessed undisclosed assets,this is the first time they are putting a number to the scale of tax evasion by them.
We have also gathered corroborative evidence from the parties who have sold properties to these relatives of KGB.Those who have sold the properties have also told us where they had parked the excess money they had obtained other than what had been shown in the property deal documents, IT officials,who requested anonymity,told TOI.The offence invites aminimum fine of Rs 2.7 crore and it can go up to three times that amount as per Section 271 (1) c of the IT Act.KGB's kin are also liable for prosecution and can face imprisonment from three months to three years as per the Section 276 (C) of the IT Act,the officials revealed.The IT department had recently sent a report to the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) recommending detailed investigations by appropriate Central agencies to detect the source of income of KGBs relatives.
Only such an investigation will reveal whether they misused the position of 
CJI to amass the money they have invested in these property deals, the officials said.The only exit route for KGBs relatives from prosecution is approaching the IT Settlement Commission.They can walk off by paying fines if the Commission accepts their plea.SNDP leader and political heavyweight Vellappilli Nateshan had evaded prosecution in similar circumstances.



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9863
Date:
Permalink  
 

சீப் விஜிலன்ஸ் கமிஷனர் -KGB !
(சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட் முன்னாள் தலைமை நீதிபதி )-
மாப்பிள்ளைகளின் மோசடிகள் …

சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட் முன்னாள் தலைமை நீதிபதி,
கேரளாவைச் சேர்ந்த -
கே.ஜி.பாலகிருஷ்ணன் அவர்களை
மத்திய காங்கிரஸ் அரசு தலைமை விஜிலன்ஸ்
கமிஷனராக (Chief Vigilance
Commissioner) நியமித்தது குறித்து
விமரிசனங்கள் எழுந்தது நினைவிருக்கலாம்.
சோனியா காந்தியால் தேர்வு செய்யப்பட்டவர்
இவர் என்பதால் – விமரிசனங்கள் 
சட்டை செய்யப்படவில்லை.

இவர் கட்டுப்பாட்டில் தான் சிபிஐ 
சாதாரண காலங்களில் இயங்குகிறது.

சூடு,சொரணை  இருப்பவர்களாக இருந்தால்,
விமரிசனங்கள் எழுந்தபோதே ராஜினாமா
கொடுத்து விட்டுப் போயிருப்பார்கள்.

ஆனால் – இவரை நியமித்தவர்களுக்காக
இவர் செய்ய வேண்டிய கடமைகள் (?)
நிறைய இருக்கின்றனவே !
அவற்றை முடிக்காமல் போனால் -
இவருக்கு வேறு விதமான சிக்கல்கள் 
ஏற்படலாம். எனவே இன்னும் பதவியில்
விசுவாசமாக இருக்கிறார்.

இவருக்கு இரண்டு மாப்பிள்ளைகள்.
பிவி ஸ்ரீநிஜன் & கேவி பென்னி.
கேரளாவில் இருக்கிறார்கள்.
சில மாதங்களுக்கு முன்னர் நிகழ்ந்த
வருமான வரி இலாகாவின் சோதனையில்
இவர்கள் இருவரும் அவர்கள் வாங்கிய சொத்துக்களை
மதிப்பு குறைத்து காட்டிய வகையில் 
அரசாங்கத்தை சுமார் 9 கோடி அளவிற்கு 
ஏமாற்றி இருப்பது கண்டு பிடிக்கப்பட்டுள்ளது.

(இது சொத்தின் மதிப்பு அல்ல.
மதிப்பை குறைத்து காட்டிய வகையில்
அரசாங்கத்தை ஏமாற்றிய தொகை.
மொத்த சொத்துக்களின் மதிப்பு எவ்வளவு
என்பது வெளியிடப்படவில்லை !)

முன்னாள் தலைமை நீதிபதி பாலகிருஷ்ணன்
பதவியை தவறாகப் பயன்படுத்தி இந்த 
சொத்துகள் வாங்கப்பட்டிருக்கலாமோ என்று
விசாரணை நடந்து வருகிறது !

தற்போது கண்டுபிடிக்கப்பட்டுள்ள மோசடிக்காக,
வருமான வரி சட்டம்,பிரிவு 276(c)ன் படி,
2.7 கோடி ரூபாய் அபராதம் விதிப்பதுடன்,
3 வருடங்கள் வரையிலான சிறைத்தண்டனையும்
கிடைக்கலாமாம்.

ஆனால் -  இவை எல்லாம் நடக்கும் என்று
யாரும் நினைத்து விட வேண்டாம்.

இதை எல்லாம் காட்டி பயமுறுத்தி,
தங்கள் வழியில் நடக்கச் செய்யத் தானே
“மூலம்” செயல்படுகிறது !



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 9863
Date:
Permalink  
 

Kerala’s political scrap may uncover India’s judical “fixer”, fixer for ex-CJI KGB

 
Kerala’s political scrap may uncover India’s judical “fixer”
Nov 7, 2011

ALSO SEE

Was ex-CJI Balakrishnan a fixer? Ex-judge says he was approached
'Ex-CJI’s brother used his name for personal gains'
Register FIR against ex-CJI & relatives, says whistleblower

By VK Shashikumar, Canary Trap, Special to Firstpost

A seemingly innocuous early morning (8.00am) half-hour meeting on 23 October at a guest house in Aluva (Alleppey) between former Kerala Chief Minister VS Achuthanandan and a Dubai-based non-resident Indian, Thekkemuri Gopinathan Nandakumar (or TGN Kumar), has set off a raging political controversy.

Cabinet ministers of the ruling United Democratic Front (UDF), led by Congress Chief Minister Oommen Chandy, says Nandakumar is a “corporate broker” and a “”judiciary fixer”. UDF leaders have described the meeting between Achuthanandan and Nandakumar as “mysterious” and “unbelievable”.
sc380.jpg


Supreme Court of India. Reuters
“Nandakumar has so far been widely acknowledged in Kerala’s legal circles as the “fixer” for a former Chief Justice of India (CJI),” claims Kerala lawyer Mathews J Nedumpara, who heads the Mumbai-headquartered National Lawyers Campaign for Judicial Transparency and Reforms.

Firstpost has exclusive access to the litany of complaints despatched by the National Lawyers Campaign, an intelligence report and Nandakumar’s bank statements. These documents raise serious questions about the nature of Nandakumar’s relationship not only with Justice Balakrishnan, but several other top high court and Supreme Court judges (past and present) and politicians. However, we are not publishing the entire contents of the complaints because they may be substantially libellous and—at this point—unsubstantiated.

However, the case of the alleged fixer, Nandakumar, is another matter. Dogged investigative reporting by local newspapers and Malayalam news channels in Kerala has revealed suspicious transactions of a value of Rs 40 crore in Nandakumar’s bank accounts.

Bank Statement
This has blown the lid off the tightly corked bottle of “legal fixing” in the Indian judiciary. The fizz spilling out of this bottle of secrets is bound to make Nandakumar infamous as the story travels from the deep-south to India’s power capital, New Delhi.

The glut of high-profile corruption cases crowding the courts in Delhi may have provided the perfect camouflage to hide the consternation in judicial and political circles about Nedumpara’s allegations – which have been circulated to everyone from the president down to the vice-president and the PMO and the ministry of law (See acknowledgement from president’s office). But media reports in Kerala have been pointing out for over nearly two weeks that the Kerala police and intelligence agencies have been investigating this man for nearly a year. “Nandakumar was a conduit for corrupt judges,” alleges Nedumpara.

President Secretariat Response
President Secretariat Response
That remains to be established, but prima facie, Nandakumar’s meteoric rise does require detailed examination. His story is intricately complex. So it’s important to start the narrative from the complaint sent by Nedumpara to the Chief Justice of India.

Here is an extract from the National Lawyers Campaign’s confidential letter dated 4 February 2011:

“I have very definite and absolutely reliable information of a conduit…He is Mr. TGN Kumar, his Cell Phone numbers are 9847095080…and…. He may be a matriculate, at the most an under-graduate. His only and exclusive business is being a conduit of judges. There are many judges of the Supreme Court and the high courts (of) whom he claims to be, and I believe truly, a conduit. He has a long list of judges, of whom he claims to be a conduit.”

The letter then goes to name several judges from various high courts and even the Supreme Court, which Firstpost is not publishing for obvious reasons.

But the letter makes it clear that Kumar needs to be investigated since he has risen from nothing to a millionaire. Says Nedumpara: “He was a small-time personal assistant to the late Shri Harkishan Singh Surjeet (former CPM General Secretary) , drawing two or three thousand rupees as salary 15 years before. What is he today! He is a millionaire, lives abroad. He has no job or occupation known to the world except being a conduit, a ‘fixer’ in popular parlance.”

The letter also claims that Kumar was close to the previous CM of Kerala, and calls for an investigation. He followed it up with another letter on 5 March, in which he dragged in the name of former CJI Balakrishnan, and makes a reference to senior Kerala high court advocate K Ram Kumar, who told a TV channel without naming Kumar directly that he “is a frequent visitor to many judges of the Supreme Court…An inquiry focused on Shri TGN Kumar will lead to many skeletons tumbling down.”

It appears that Nedumpara also met the former chief of external spy agency Research & Analysis Wing (R&AW chief), Hormis Tharakan, and the Intelligence Bureau has been probing the mysterious activities of Nandakumar. The Kerala police’s crime branch is investigating a case registered against him by an activist, Jomon Puthenpurackal, who is well known in the state for his campaign for justice in the Sister Abhaya murder case.

Puthenpurackal filed a complaint to former Kerala Home Minister Kodiyeri Balakrishnan accusing Nandakumar of forging his signature while sending a complaint to the president of India against Justice Abdul Rahim, currently a sitting judge in the Kerala High Court, days before his appointment as high court judge.

Nandakumar is charged with forging Puthenpurackal’s signature in the complaint letter which claimed that Justice Rahim had connections with terror groups and organisations sympathetic to such groups.

Authoritative sources in Kerala police’s crime branch, who wished to remain unnamed, claimed that “the crime branch has recorded statements from Nandakumar and Puthenpurackal, but could not proceed further as the registrar of the Supreme Court didn’t hand over the forged letter to the police for verification of the signature.”

The objective of this mischief, allegedly hatched by Nandakumar, was to stall Justice Rahim’s appointment as a high court judge. All this happened during the tenure of Balakrishnan as the Chief Justice of India.

The Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau (VACB) director, KP Somarajan, had directed Vigilance SP, Ernakulam, to inquire into the assets of TG Nandakumar. Nothing much has been heard on this front ever since. Puthenpurackal says Nandakumar had amassed assets worth Rs 40 crore in the last five years.

Firstpost learns that at one stage, Nandakumar was accused of attacking a school teacher, which led to the registration of a case against him at Trikkakara. He was later acquitted in the case.

At the small tea-stall grandly named ‘Food Court Tea Stall’ just outside the Kerala High Court premises in Kochi, the favourite topic of discussion these times amongst lawyers is Nandakumar’s rise from a matriculate (Class X pass-out) to the suave international traveller who goes only business class.

“He has amazing access to judges in various high courts across the country. He walks into the chambers of certain Supreme Court judges. During Justice Balakrishnan’s tenure, Nandakumar was treated like a VIP in Supreme Court. Such was his clout,” claims Nedumpara. “How did an uneducated resident of Thammanam in Ernakulam city become such an influential mover and shaker in the Indian judiciary? How did he get the clout to walk announced into the residences of Supreme Court and high court judges?”

Excerpts from an intelligence report (See document) suggest that Nandakumar identifies himself sometimes as “Dr Kumar” and at other times as “Advocate Kumar”. Lawyers in Kerala, though, have nicknamed him as “Complaint Kumar” because of his penchant to shoot off allegedly forged complaint letters!

The intelligence report goes on to state that “he introduces himself as an advocate of the Supreme Court. He is a regular domestic passenger of Jet Airways and Kingfisher flights to Mumbai, Delhi and Chennai from Kochi. He is in the habit of wearing safari suits and travelling in executive class…His flight tickets are booked by Akbar Travels in Palarivattom, Ernakulam.”

The intelligence report surprisingly provides lot of leads for the law enforcement agencies, as it gives his passport, phone and fax numbers.

Nandakumar, 41, spends most of his time in Dubai, but he has a Rs 1 crore house in Thammanam, Ernakulam, which is currently occupied by his mother. Before his meteoric rise he was an active worker of the Kerala Students Union and later the Youth Congress.

“His stints as personal assistant to Harkishan Singh Surjeet in the mid-1990s brought him in close contact with politicians in Delhi. This was followed by his stint as personal assistant to Justice Sukhdev Singh Kang when he was Governor of Kerala. His easygoing ways and glib talk helped him make friends with politicians, high-profile lawyers and litigants,” says Nedumpara.

According to the National Lawyers Campaign, by 2003, thanks to the support from some judges, Nandakumar allegedly morphed into a fixer. He became a regular in the high courts of Chennai, Mumbai and Bangalore and also in the Supreme Court.

In 2007, Nandakumar’s shenanigans attracted the attention of the Intelligence Bureau. How was a person with no known sources of income frequently travelling business class to Dubai and Europe?

Why was Nandakumar’s entry and exit from Kochi’s airport so privileged? These and several other such unknown facets of ‘TGN’ (as he is known in Kerala) came under IB’s watch.

In fact, an intelligence officer posted at Kochi airport faxed two reports numbered 574 (dated October 10, 2008) and 656 (dated November 12, 2008) alerting the agency about Nandakumar’s ease of entry and exit from Kochi airport.

This was followed by another IB report dated 20 January 2009 in which an intelligence officer despatched a fax to his unit head stating that an Inspector General of Police directed the immigration officials at Kochi airport to clear Nandakumar who arrived from Dubai by Emirates flight EK-530.
IB REPORT
The report stated: ““The arrival of the subject was informed in advance by *********(name with-held) to airport immigration and immigration was asked by IGP to clear him without delay. Accordingly, on arrival he was received by an immigration official and cleared and allowed to leave the airport immediately”.

Nandakumar’s travel records, locked in the Kerala police crime branch files, reveal that he indeed took off from Kochi for Dubai on 8 January 2009 on Emirates flight EK 531 and returned on 20 January 2009 by EK 530. On 26 January 2009 he again left for Dubai and returned on 4 February 2009.

The intelligence report further says: “The subject came to notice travelling to Delhi and coming back on the same day on two occasions recently. He left for Delhi on 5 October 2009 and returned by IC flights. Both occasions one Union minister of state and a Union minister travelled to Kochi in the same flight. The Union minister was noticed coming out of the airport and patting on the shoulder of the subject (Kumar) before parting at the airport”.

A political scandal is brewing and it has set wagging tongues. But Chief Minister Oommen Chandy is still fighting shy of ordering a full-scale investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation. Especially when in March 2011, Chandy (then in the role of the leader of the opposition), had sought a probe into a Kerala government deal allegedly “fixed” by Nandakumar.

Chandy had accused the then LDF government led by VS Achuthanandan of corruption for transferring the control of the State Data Centre to the Reliance group and demanding an inquiry into the deal. The State Data Centre (SDC) was set up by the Kerala government in 2005 in Thiruvananthapuram to boost e-governance activities of the state.

Incidentally, the data centre was set up when Chandy was the Chief Minister on an earlier occasion. It was first entrusted to C-Dat, a central government organisation, for a period of three years. When this arrangement lapsed the LDF government transferred control of the centre to Reliance group in 2008. The allegation is that this transfer or deal was facilitated by Nandakumar.

At a hurriedly convened press conference during the LDF regime, Chandy said he was distressed to know that the “Reliance group has been allowed to take over the public sector data centre. The Chief Minister (Achuthanandan) has deviated from the Left Democratic Front’s declared anti-privatisation policy. By getting easy access to vital data stored at the centre, the Reliance group could use it to further its business interests and cause financial loss to the state government.”

“The chief minister was not able to give a convincing explanation on the issue when it was first raised in the assembly by PC George in 2008. The gravity of the case had enhanced following an allegation by lawyer Ram Kumar that TG Nandakumar, who claims he was a paid consultant to the Reliance, had close links with Mr Achuthanandan.”

After having made such a strong statement as leader of the opposition in March 2011, one wonders why Chandy as the current CM is maintaining a studied silence. Is it because Nandakumar also has strong ties to Congress ministers?

Strangely, except for Chandy, other Congress leaders are going ballistic on this potentially juicy corruption scandal. “The passport of Nandakumar will provide all details of his travels abroad,” says PC Vishnunath, Congress MLA and State Youth Congress president. He questioned the purpose of Achuthanandan’s recent meeting with the alleged fixer. “Nandakumar is a corporate broker with no credibility. Why should VS meet such a person? This proves that Achuthanandan’s claim of political morality is just a mask.”

Even LDF politicians in Kerala are embarrassed by the former chief minister’s links to an alleged “corporate broker”. But the man at the centre of the controversy is denying any wrongdoing. Even Nandakumar has blamed “vested interests” for spinning a yarn over his “very personal meeting” with Achuthanandan.

“My meeting him had nothing to do with politics or legal cases. It was personal,” he told journalists on phone from Dubai. “I have met VS several times when he was CM. But none of those meetings was a secret. I had met him as a representative of my client companies on matters related with the industrialisation of Kerala. One such company is still involved in the proposed Vizhinjam container trans-shipment project.”

The income tax department has found that big transactions worth crores were made through Nandakumar’s bank account held at ICICI Bank, MG Road, Ernakulam. During June 2009 his account showed an entry of Rs 4.5 crore. This happened around the time when the LDF government decided to transfer the State Data Centre to Reliance.

Kerala’s crime branch, vigilance and anti-corruption bureau and state intelligence bureau have dossiers on Nandakumar and his activities. The National Lawyers Campaign, led by Nedumpara, has shared several intelligence inputs with the who’s who of the Indian establishment. Suspicious bank transactions in the account of Nandakumar are no longer a secret. His links with judges, politicians and corporate entities are the stuff of endless discussions in Kerala these days.

What is preventing Oommen Chandy from recommending a CBI inquiry?

http://www.firstpost.com/india/keralas-political-scrap-may-uncover-indias-judical-fixer-125229.html


__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 24603
Date:
Permalink  
 

14_02_2012_001_046.jpg KGB

 

14_02_2012_005_026.jpg sc kgb

14_02_2012_013_012.jpg KGB



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 24603
Date:
Permalink  
 

15_02_2012_013_014.jpg Jus KGB



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 24603
Date:
Permalink  
 

Benami KGB: Shame on KGB who should resign forthwith

 
Allegations against ex-CJI Balakrishnan being probed: Govt to SC

PTI / Monday, March 12, 2012 13:52 IST
The Centre on Monday told the Supreme Court that it is probing into the allegations that former Chief Justice of India KG Balakrishnan and his relatives had amassed disproportionate assets during his tenure as judge and submitted a probe status report to it in a sealed envelop.

Appearing before a bench of Chief Justice SH Kapadia and Justice Swatanter Kumar, Attorney General GE Vahanvati said the Income Tax Department is currently engaged in assessing the properties of Balakrishnan's two son-in-laws and brother.

The bench after going through the report asked the government to tell it as to what further action it intended to take on allegations against former CJI.

The bench granted three weeks to apprise it of the future course of action, to be taken by the government on the issue.

The court's direction came during hearing of a Public Interest Litigation filed by civil society Common Cause, which alleged that ex-CJI and his relative amassed wealth far exceeding their legal income during Balakrishnan's tenure as an apex court's judge.

The PIL sought apex court's direction to the government to take proper action against the ex-XJI, who is presently the chairman of National Human Rights Commission (NHRC).

Justice Balakrishnan had been elevated as a Supreme Court judge in June 2000 and was appointed the Chief Justice of India on January 14, 2007. He retired on May 12, 2010 after which he was appointed NHRC chairman.

The NGO has sought direction to the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) for making a reference to the apex court under the Human Rights Act to look into the allegations of "misbehaviour" against Justice Balakrishnan.

"Despite the fact that there is overwhelming evidence indicating that the respondent no 3 (Balakrishnan) has been guilty of several acts of grave misbehaviour, the government has not taken any step for his removal from the NHRC," said the petition, filed through lawyer Prashant Bhushan.

A provision under the Human Rights Act says the NHRC Chairperson or its other members "shall be removed from his office by the order of the President of India on the ground of misbehaviour after the Supreme Court, on a reference being made to it by the President, has on inquiry reported that the Chairperson or such member, on any such ground, be removed."

Common Cause, in its petition, has annexed media reports as documents to buttress its allegations that 'benami' properties were acquired by kith and kin of Balakrishnan during his tenure in the Supreme Court.

Justice Balakrishnan had been elevated as a Supreme Court judge in June 2000 and was appointed the Chief Justice of

India on January 14, 2007. He retired on May 12, 2010 after which he was appointed NHRC chairman. The NGO has sought direction to the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) for making a reference to the apex court under the Human Rights Act to look into the allegations of "misbehaviour" against Justice Balakrishnan. "Despite the fact that there is overwhelming evidence indicating that the respondent no 3 (Balakrishnan) has been guilty of several acts of grave misbehaviour, the government has not taken any step for his removal from the NHRC," said the petition, filed through lawyer Prashant Bhushan. A provision under the Human Rights Act says the NHRC Chairperson or its other members "shall be removed from his office by the order of the President of India on the ground of misbehaviour after the Supreme Court, on a reference being made to it by the President, has on inquiry reported that the Chairperson or such member, on any such ground, be removed." Common Cause, in its petition, has annexed media reports as documents to buttress its allegations that 'benami' properties were acquired by kith and kin of Balakrishnan during his tenure in the Supreme Court.

URL of the article: http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_allegations-against-ex-cji-balakrishnan-being-probed-govt-to-sc_1661345-all


__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 24603
Date:
Permalink  
 

Large amounts paid to KGB kin: Govt to SC 

Need To Probe If Money Trail Leads To Ex-CJI 

Dhananjay Mahapatra TNN 

New Delhi: Former Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnans tenure as chairman of the National Human Rights Commission hit a bump on Monday when the government for the first time filed an investigation status report before the Supreme Court,detailing large payments allegedly made to his two sons-in-law and brother when he was the CJI.
A bench of Chief Justice SH Kapadia and Justice Swatanter Kumar was informed by attorney general G E Vahanvati that the income tax departments probe had also revealed that the properties acquired by the sons-in-law and brother at this time were declared but prima facie appeared to be held benami and grossly undervalued.
Regarding the large payments to Justice Balakrishnans son,the AG said,Why were the payments made Is there a link to the payments Income tax department cannot investigate why payments were made.This needs to be gone into at a different level. 
This indicates that other agencies may be roped in to probe the charges against the ex-CJI.It also indicates that the government is not holding back its hand any longer on the controversy.
When the controversy first appeared in the media,Justice Balakrishnan had told TOI that he had nothing to hide and if his relatives were in possession of unaccounted wealth,it was for them to answer the I-T department.

TROUBLED TIMES 


Govt files a probe status report on assets of K G Balakrishnans relatives before the SC detailing alleged large payments made to his two sons-in-law and brother when he was the head of the judiciary Properties acquired by Balakrishnans sons-in-law and brother during his tenure prima facie appeared to be held benami and undervalued


Pc0012400.jpg 



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 24603
Date:
Permalink  
 

Balakrishnan in a tight spot 


The bench of Justices Kapadia and Kumar carefully stepped around counsel Prashant Bhushans plea for a direction to the Union government to send a presidential reference to the apex court to inquire into the misconduct of the ex-CJI and give its opinion whether the former CJI should continue as the head of NHRC.Instead,the bench asked Vahanvati,We only want to know what further step the government intends to take in this matter. 
This might push Justice Balakrishnan into a tight spot,given the high degree of propriety attached to the position of NHRC chairman,even though it is only a statutory and not a constitutional post.


__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 24603
Date:
Permalink  
 

KGB 13_03_2012_009_023



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 24603
Date:
Permalink  
 

5-judge Constitution Bench to frame norms on court reporting; fall-out of case against former CJI, KGB

 

Published: March 15, 2012 01:50 IST | Updated: March 15, 2012 01:50 IST 

Constitution Bench to frame norms on court reporting

J. Venkatesan
To ensure against distortion of court proceedings

A five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court will hear from the third week of this month suggestions on framing guidelines for the media on court reporting with a view to ensuring that day-day-proceedings are not distorted or misreported.

Chief Justice S.K. Kapadia, heading a three-judge Bench, gave this indication on Tuesday after referring to a news item pertaining to the former CJI, K.G. Balakrishnan, that appeared in an English newspaper.

Justice Kapadia said: “We are all upset at the report. Some statements have been attributed to Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati which he never stated in court. We constitute a Constitution Bench to frame guidelines for reporting by the media.”

The CJI then asked senior lawyers Fali Nariman and K. K Venugopal and the Attorney-General to assist the court in formulating the issues and in framing guidelines.

Justice Kapadia referred to a complaint made to him by Mr. Venugopal, during the hearing of a writ petition relating to the former Central Vigilance Commissioner, P.J. Thomas, about misreporting of his arguments by an anchor and his request that the court take action against the television channel concerned. The CJI told Mr. Venugopal that he did not file any application in this regard. However, after the CJI made a request, Mr. Venugopal readily agreed to assist the court.

Recently, Mr. Nariman also took exception to a news item, published in a section of the media, about an agreement between Sahara Investments and the Securities and Exchange Board of India even before the Supreme Court approved it. On the CJI's advice, Mr. Nariman has already filed an application to bring on record the misreporting. Now, the Constitution Bench is expected to hear specific instances as well as general issues and frame guidelines.

http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article2995825.ece

Large amounts paid to KG Balakrishnan's kin: Govt to SC
Dhananjay Mahapatra, TNN Mar 13, 2012, 04.10AM IST

NEW DELHI: Former Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan's tenure as chairman of National Human Rights Commission hit a bump on Monday when the government for the first time filed an investigation status report before the Supreme Court detailing large payments allegedly made to his two sons-in-law and brother when he was the CJI.

A bench of Chief Justice S H Kapadia and Justice Swatanter Kumar was informed by attorney general G E Vahanvati that the income tax department's probe had also revealed that the properties acquired by the sons-in-law and brother at this time were declared but prima facie appeared to be held benami and grossly undervalued.
Regarding the large payments to Justice Balakrishnan's son, the AG said, "Why were the payments made? Is there a link to the payments? Income tax department cannot investigate why payments were made. This needs to be gone into at a different level."

This indicates that other agencies may be roped in to probe the charges against the ex-CJI. It also indicates that the government is not holding back its hand any longer on the controversy.

When the controversy about the disproportionate assets of his relatives first appeared in the media, Justice Balakrishnan had told TOI that he had nothing to hide and if his relatives were in possession of unaccounted wealth, it was for them to answer the I-T department.

The bench of Justices Kapadia and Kumar carefully stepped around counsel Prashant Bhushan's plea for a direction to the Union government to send a presidential reference to the apex court to inquire into the misconduct of the ex-CJI and give its opinion whether the former CJI should continue as the head of NHRC.

Instead, the bench asked Vahanvati, "We only want to know what further step the government intends to take in this matter." This might push Justice Balakrishnan into a tight spot, given the high degree of propriety attached to the position of NHRC chairman, even though it is only a statutory and not a constitutional post. The AG sought three weeks to respond to the question and said, "We may have to convene another meeting of all agencies on this issue."

At the beginning of the hearing, Vahanvati handed over a status report by the I-T department to the bench, which during the last hearing on two PILs filed by NGO Common Cause and advocate M L Sharma, sought details of every investigation carried out by the agencies into the charges against the former CJI.

When the bench asked about the status of other investigations, Vahanvati said, "The representations received in the Prime Minister's Office were forwarded to the ministry of home affairs, which in turn were sent to the CBI." However, the CBI appears to have not investigated the allegations because of the vagueness of the charges leveled in the representations.

http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-03-13/india/31159055_1_sons-in-law-and-brother-justice-balakrishnan-status-report

The bench adjourned hearing on the petitions for three weeks saying, "Let the AG take instructions on what steps the government is taking."

Attorney General G E Vahanvati on Monday raised questions before the Supreme Court about the large payments made to former CJI K G Balakrishnan's relatives. The government's stand indicates that other agencies may be roped in to probe the charges against the ex-CJI. It also indicates that the government is not holding back its hand any longer on the controversy.

When the controversy about the disproportionate assets of his relatives first appeared in the media, Justice Balakrishnan had told TOI that he had nothing to hide and if his relatives were in possession of unaccounted wealth, it was for them to answer the I-T department. The bench of Justices Kapadia and Kumar carefully stepped around counsel Prashant Bhushan's plea for a direction to the Union government to send a presidential reference to the apex court to inquire into the misconduct of the ex-CJI and give its opinion whether the former CJI should continue as the head of NHRC.

Instead, the bench asked Vahanvati, "We only want to know what further step the government intends to take in this matter." This might push Justice Balakrishnan in a tight spot, given the high degree of propriety attached to the position of NHRC chairman, even though it is not a constitutional post. The AG sought three weeks to respond to the question and said, "We may have to convene another meeting of all agencies on this issue."

At the beginning of the hearing, Vahanvati handed over a status report by the I-T department to the bench, which during the last hearing on two PILs filed by NGO Common Cause and advocate M L Sharma, sought details of every investigation carried out by the agencies into the charges against the former CJI.

When the bench asked about the status of other investigations, Vahanvati said, "The representations received in the PM's Office were forwarded to the ministry of home affairs, which in turn were sent to the CBI." However, the CBI appears to have not investigated the allegations because of the vagueness of the charges leveled in the representations.

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_allegations-against-ex-cji-balakrishnan-being-probed-govt-to-sc_1661345

Charges against Balakrishnan being probed: Centre to SC
Mar 12, 2012
New Delhi: The Centre today told the Supreme Court that it is probing into the allegations that former Chief Justice of India KG Balakrishnan and his relatives had amassed disproportionate assets during his tenure as judge and submitted a probe status report to it in a sealed envelop.

Appearing before a bench of Chief Justice SH Kapadia and Justice Swatanter Kumar, Attorney General GE Vahanvati said the Income Tax Department is currently engaged in assessing the properties of Balakrishnan’s two son-in-laws and brother.

Former Chief Justice of India KG Balakrishnan. Screengrab from ibnlive.com
The bench after going through the report asked the government to tell it as to what further action it intended to take on allegations against former CJI.

The bench granted three weeks to apprise it of the future course of action, to be taken by the government on the issue.

The court’s direction came during hearing of a Public Interest Litigation filed by civil society Common Cause, which alleged that ex-CJI and his relative amassed wealth far exceeding their legal income during Balakrishnan’s tenure as an apex court’s judge.

The PIL sought apex court’s direction to the government to take proper action against the ex-XJI, who is presently the chairman of National Human Rights Commission (NHRC).

Justice Balakrishnan had been elevated as a Supreme Court judge in June 2000 and was appointed the Chief Justice of India on 14 January 2007. He retired on 12 May 2010 after which he was appointed NHRC chairman.

The NGO has sought direction to the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) for making a reference to the apex court under the Human Rights Act to look into the allegations of “misbehaviour” against Justice Balakrishnan.

“Despite the fact that there is overwhelming evidence indicating that the respondent no 3 (Balakrishnan) has been guilty of several acts of grave misbehaviour, the government has not taken any step for his removal from the NHRC,” said the petition, filed through lawyer Prashant Bhushan.

A provision under the Human Rights Act says the NHRC Chairperson or its other members “shall be removed from his office by the order of the President of India on the ground of misbehaviour after the Supreme Court, on a reference being made to it by the President, has on inquiry reported that the Chairperson or such member, on any such ground, be removed.”

Common Cause, in its petition, has annexed media reports as documents to buttress its allegations that ‘benami’ properties were acquired by kith and kin of Balakrishnan during his tenure in the Supreme Court.

PTI



http://www.firstpost.com/india/allegations-against-balakrishnan-being-probed-centre-to-sc-241041.html


__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 24603
Date:
Permalink  
 

IN THE COURT 

TIMES NEWS NETWORK 

SC turns the heat on Balakrishnan 

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday took note of some investigation by the Income Tax department into alleged corruption charges against ex-CJI K G Balakrishnan prior to reserving its verdict on a PIL seeking initiation of a constitutional process for his removal as the chairman of National Human Rights Commission (NHRC).
The PIL by NGO,Common Cause,heard all along by a bench of Chief Justice SH Kapadia and Justice Swatanter Kumar,was listed on Monday before a bench of Justices BS Chauhan and JS Khehar.The NGOs counsel Prashant Bhushan expressed surprise that a two-page note on status of the investigation by I-T department given by attorney general GE Vahanvati to the earlier bench was missing from court files.
Bhushan said: I am distressed.The AGs March 12 note has disappeared from the file.My note summarizing the charges and evidence against the NHRC chief has disappeared and the AG too has disappeared. 
Additional solicitor general Gaurab Banerjee said he was present for the government as the AG was out of town,and termed Bhushans remarks on Vahanvatis absence as unfortunate and unwarranted.
Bhushan said the AG had on March 12 informed the bench of CJI and Justice Kumar that Rs 60 lakh was paid by a law firm to Justice Balakrishnans son-inlaw for no services rendered by him and that the I-T department had not yet come across a link between the ex-CJI and the payment.

Centre opposes Chistys Pak visit 


The Union government on Monday opposed permission to octogenarian Pakistani virologist Mohammad Khalil Chisty to visit Karachi while being on bail during the pendency of his appeal against conviction and life sentence for a murder in Ajmer,Rajasthan,20 years ago.TNN 

Notices to govts on nurses plight 


The Supreme Court on Monday issued notices to the Union and state governments on a petition alleging that nurses faced considerable harassment at work place but were forced to stick to their jobs in a particular hospital or a nursing home because they refuse to return original educational certificates submitted at the time of joining work.TNN 

SC notice to Centre on SIMI ban 


The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to the Centre on a writ petition filed by ex-office bearers of the Students Islamic Movement of India (SIMI) that challenged the extension of a decade-old decision to place the organization in the banned list under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act.TNN


__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 24603
Date:
Permalink  
 

SC asks Centre to examine allegations against ex-CJI 

May Lose NHRC Post If Charges Proved Correct 

Dhananjay Mahapatra TNN 

New Delhi:In an unprecedented move,the Supreme Court on Thursday requested the Centre to examine allegations of serious corruption and misconduct against former Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan and take suitable action,including his removal as the chief of the National Human Rights Commission,if the charges were found correct.
A bench,comprising Justice B S Chauhan and Justice J S Khehar,said if the competent authority found that the allegations deserved to be acted upon,then the President on the advice of the council of ministers could go ahead as per Section 5(2) of the Protection of Human Rights Act,1993,and send a reference to the Supreme Court for its opinion on the removal of Justice Balakrishnan as chairperson of the apex human rights body.
This is the first instance of the apex court telling the government to decide on a complaint against a former Chief Justice of India.It is also the first time that the SC has said the government could consider sending a reference against an NHRC chief if the accusations against him were found worth inquiring into.

SC to hear PIL against AP judge 


The Supreme Court on Thursday agreed to hear a PIL seeking to quash the appointment of a Andhra Pradesh HC judge for allegedly suppressing information about a criminal case against him at the time of his elevation.Justice N V Ramana was named an accused in a case of rioting in 1981 when he was a student but did not mention this when he enrolled as an advocate two years later.P 13 

THE CHARGES 




Five allegations against ex-CJI Balakrishnan levelled in letter to President by campaigners for judicial accountability: 


Benami properties in names of his daughters,sons-in-law & brothers Benami properties in former aide M Kannabirans name allegedly given from discretionary quota of then Tamil Nadu CM Karunanidhi Approved evasive replies by SC in response to RTI query on declaration of assets by judges Resisted attempts to prevent elevation of Justice Dinakaran to SC despite charges of land grab,encroachment and disproportionate assets against him Suppressed letter by an HC judge alleging that former Union minister A Raja tried to interfere in his judicial functioning


Pc0011500.jpg 



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 24603
Date:
Permalink  
 

Benami property among charges against KGB 


If the allegations in the aforesaid determination are found to be unworthy of any further action,the petitioners shall be informed accordingly.Alternatively,the President,based on the advice of the council of ministers,may proceed with the matter in accordance with the mandate of Section 5(2) of the 1993 Act, the bench said.
The order came on a PIL that NGO Common Cause filed a year ago,detailing serious allegations levelled against the former CJI by Committee on Judicial Accountability and Reforms,including acquisition of several properties in the name of his family members.
Writing the judgment for the bench,Justice Khehar said the PIL could be disposed of by requesting the competent authority to take a decision on the memorandum CJAR had submitted to the President demanding action against the NHRC chief.
On April 4 last year,CJAR wrote to President Pratibha Patil requesting her to make a reference to the SC for inquiry into the misbehaviour of Justice K G Balakrishnan,chairman,National Human Rights Commission and ex-Chief Justice of India,under Section 5(1) of the Protection of Human Rights Act,1993.
Section 5(2) of the Protection of Human Rights Act provides that the chairperson or any member shall be removed from his office by order of the President of India on the ground of proved misbehaviour or incapacity after the Supreme Court,on inquiry held in accordance with the procedure prescribed in that behalf by the Supreme Court,reports that the chairperson or the member,as the case may be,ought on any such ground to be removed.
The five charges sought to be inquired against Balakrishnan and his relatives are: 
Benami properties in the names of his daughters,sonsin-law and brothers (CJAR complaint lists a huge number of benami properties allegedly purchased by them) 
Benami properties in the name of his former aide M Kannabiran allegedly given from discretionary quota of then Tamil Nadu chief minister M Karunanidhi 
Justice Balakrishnan allegedly approved of evasive and false replies given by CPIO,Supreme Court in response to RTI application filed by Subhash Chandra Agarwal regarding declaration of assets by judges 
Resisting attempts to stop elevation of Justice Paul Dinakaran to the Supreme Court despite many charges of land grab,encroachment and possessing assets beyond his known sources of income 
Suppressing a letter written by a high court judge alleging that former Union minister A Raja tried to interfere in his judicial function and later lying to the press that he had not received any such letter implicating any Union minister 
Though the apex court asked the competent authority to look into the CJAR communication,it did not prescribe any time limit for it.

Pc0121800.jpg 
UNDER SCANNER 
 


__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard